Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACIX vs FAGNX
BACIX vs FAGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACIX vs. FAGNX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACIX is a Hold and FAGNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 942M vs. BACIX (267M). BACIX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: BACIX (2.60) vs FAGNX (0.77). BACIX was incepted earlier than FAGNX: BACIX (21 years) vs FAGNX (38 years). FAGNX (1.23) is less costly to investors than BACIX (1.07). BACIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FAGNX (31.00). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACIX: FAGNX (0) vs BACIX (2000000). BACIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.25 vs. FAGNX (-5.02). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 174.35 vs. BACIX (138.13).
| BACIX | FAGNX | BACIX / FAGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.23 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.23 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.377 | 1.550 | 282% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 267M | 942M | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.60 | 0.77 | 337% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.25 | -5.02 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.80 | 20.70 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 138.13 | 174.35 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.83 | 56.20 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement