Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACIX vs FAGNX
BACIX vs FAGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACIX vs. FAGNX commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACIX is a Hold and FAGNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 895M vs. BACIX (271M). BACIX pays higher dividends than FAGNX: BACIX (2.54) vs FAGNX (0.75). BACIX was incepted earlier than FAGNX: BACIX (21 years) vs FAGNX (38 years). FAGNX (1.23) is less costly to investors than BACIX (1.04). BACIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FAGNX (15.00). FAGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACIX: FAGNX (0) vs BACIX (2000000). FAGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.75 vs. BACIX (1.86). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 216.91 vs. BACIX (157.56).
| BACIX | FAGNX | BACIX / FAGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.23 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.23 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.526 | 12.360 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 271M | 895M | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.54 | 0.75 | 339% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.86 | 3.75 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.72 | 13.62 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 157.56 | 216.91 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.07 | 77.87 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement