Ad is loading...
BACIX vs FIKAX
BACIX vs FIKAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACIX vs. FIKAX commentary
Apr 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACIX is a Hold and FIKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. BACIX (264M). BACIX pays higher dividends than FIKAX: BACIX (2.42) vs FIKAX (0.99). BACIX was incepted earlier than FIKAX: BACIX (20 years) vs FIKAX (7 years). BACIX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FIKAX (0.58). BACIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FIKAX (31.00). FIKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACIX: FIKAX (0) vs BACIX (2000000). BACIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.90 vs. FIKAX (-23.01). FIKAX return over 5 years is better than : 190.86 vs. BACIX (135.50).
| BACIX | FIKAX | BACIX / FIKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.58 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.58 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.077 | -11.328 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 264M | 1.08B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.42 | 0.99 | 244% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.90 | -23.01 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.62 | 4.58 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 135.50 | 190.86 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...