Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAEIX vs RMFCX
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BAEIX vs RMFCX
Sterling Capital Equity Income A
Price$21.83
Change+$0.19 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAEIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAEIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. BAEIX (1.26B). RMFCX (1.31) and BAEIX (1.30) have matching dividends . BAEIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BAEIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BAEIX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BAEIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.43 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAEIX: RMFCX (250) vs BAEIX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. BAEIX (-19.60). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.66 vs. BAEIX (15.62).
| BAEIX | RMFCX | BAEIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.034 | 5.919 | -1% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 105B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 1.31 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.60 | 9.01 | -217% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.74 | 17.82 | -100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.62 | 51.66 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.16 | 70.47 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement