Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAEIX vs RMFCX
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BAEIX vs RMFCX
Sterling Capital Equity Income A
Price$21.80
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$58.40
Change+$0.13 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107B
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAEIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAEIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. BAEIX (1.25B). RMFCX (1.31) and BAEIX (1.30) have matching dividends . BAEIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BAEIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BAEIX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BAEIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.82 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAEIX: RMFCX (250) vs BAEIX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.93 vs. BAEIX (-18.44). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 64.23 vs. BAEIX (25.77).
| BAEIX | RMFCX | BAEIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.751 | 7.643 | 10% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 107B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 1.31 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.44 | 9.93 | -186% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.15 | 27.81 | -44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.77 | 64.23 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.33 | 76.26 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement