Ad is loading...
BAEIX vs RMFCX
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BAEIX vs RMFCX
Sterling Capital Equity Income A
Price$22.17
Change-$0.30 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.53B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.23
Change-$0.62 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.64B
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAEIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAEIX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. BAEIX (1.53B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BAEIX: RMFCX (1.69) vs BAEIX (1.15). BAEIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BAEIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BAEIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.43 vs. RMFCX (25.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAEIX: RMFCX (250) vs BAEIX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.30 vs. BAEIX (-14.17). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 43.44 vs. BAEIX (11.65).
| BAEIX | RMFCX | BAEIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.499 | 6.082 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 107B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.69 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.17 | 13.30 | -107% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.09 | 20.39 | -69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.65 | 43.44 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.82 | 67.45 | 58% |