Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAEIX vs RMFCX
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BAEIX vs RMFCX
Sterling Capital Equity Income A
Price$21.84
Change+$0.09 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.2B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.45
Change+$0.16 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.64B
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAEIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAEIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. BAEIX (1.2B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BAEIX: RMFCX (1.27) vs BAEIX (1.05). BAEIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BAEIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BAEIX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BAEIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.82 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAEIX: RMFCX (250) vs BAEIX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.23 vs. BAEIX (-20.47). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.17 vs. BAEIX (18.12).
| BAEIX | RMFCX | BAEIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.753 | 9.578 | 8% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.27 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.47 | 8.23 | -249% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.95 | 31.78 | -38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.12 | 57.17 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.90 | 76.07 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement