Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAEIX vs RMFCX
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BAEIX vs RMFCX
Sterling Capital Equity Income A
Price$21.98
Change-$0.03 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.20
Change-$0.05 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAEIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAEIX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. BAEIX (1.09B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BAEIX: RMFCX (1.24) vs BAEIX (1.03). BAEIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BAEIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BAEIX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BAEIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.82 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAEIX: RMFCX (250) vs BAEIX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.75 vs. BAEIX (-21.89). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.84 vs. BAEIX (15.65).
| BAEIX | RMFCX | BAEIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.957 | 12.804 | 15% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.24 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | -21.89 | 6.75 | -324% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.96 | 33.93 | -35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.65 | 58.84 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.96 | 96.04 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement