Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAEIX vs RMFCX
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BAEIX vs RMFCX
Sterling Capital Equity Income A
Price$22.17
Change-$0.04 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAEIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAEIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. BAEIX (1.07B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BAEIX: RMFCX (1.20) vs BAEIX (0.97). BAEIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BAEIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BAEIX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BAEIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.82 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAEIX: RMFCX (250) vs BAEIX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. BAEIX (-20.11). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.28 vs. BAEIX (14.72).
| BAEIX | RMFCX | BAEIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.128 | 14.779 | 21% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 113B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 1.20 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.11 | 8.11 | -248% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.31 | 43.61 | -14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.72 | 59.28 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.19 | 93.90 | 45% |