Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAEIX vs RMFCX
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BAEIX vs RMFCX
Sterling Capital Equity Income A
Price$21.80
Change-$0.04 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.16B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.47
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.96B
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAEIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAEIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. BAEIX (1.16B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BAEIX: RMFCX (1.26) vs BAEIX (1.06). BAEIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BAEIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BAEIX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BAEIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.82 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAEIX: RMFCX (250) vs BAEIX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.26 vs. BAEIX (-18.53). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.85 vs. BAEIX (14.08).
| BAEIX | RMFCX | BAEIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.170 | 9.615 | 12% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.16B | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.26 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.53 | 9.26 | -200% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.08 | 22.20 | -86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.08 | 52.85 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.55 | 77.57 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement