Ad is loading...
BAEIX vs RMFCX
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BAEIX vs RMFCX
Sterling Capital Equity Income A
Price$20.91
Change+$0.27 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.31B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.96
Change+$0.76 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAEIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAEIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. BAEIX (1.31B). RMFCX (1.34) and BAEIX (1.28) have matching dividends . BAEIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BAEIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BAEIX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). BAEIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.43 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAEIX: RMFCX (250) vs BAEIX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.87 vs. BAEIX (-22.30). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.32 vs. BAEIX (26.53).
| BAEIX | RMFCX | BAEIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.654 | -2.681 | 174% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 95.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 1.34 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.30 | 1.87 | -1,190% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.95 | 6.27 | -366% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.53 | 53.32 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.58 | 54.78 | 49% |