Ad is loading...
BAEIX vs RMFCX
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BAEIX vs RMFCX
Sterling Capital Equity Income A
Price$22.38
Change+$0.13 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.77
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
BAEIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAEIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAEIX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. BAEIX (1.6B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BAEIX: RMFCX (1.69) vs BAEIX (1.15). BAEIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BAEIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BAEIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.43 vs. RMFCX (25.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAEIX: RMFCX (250) vs BAEIX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.43 vs. BAEIX (-11.86). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.82 vs. BAEIX (8.98).
| BAEIX | RMFCX | BAEIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.039 | 2.162 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 103B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.69 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.86 | 12.43 | -95% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.05 | 12.60 | -135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.98 | 37.82 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.10 | 65.18 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...