BAESF
Price
$20.35
Change
-$0.06 (-0.29%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
59.47B
RNMBY
Price
$282.00
Change
-$9.70 (-3.33%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
60.82B
Ad is loading...

BAESF vs RNMBY

Header iconBAESF vs RNMBY Comparison
Open Charts BAESF vs RNMBYBanner chart's image
BAE Systems
Price$20.35
Change-$0.06 (-0.29%)
Volume$66.22K
Capitalization59.47B
Rheinmetall AG
Price$282.00
Change-$9.70 (-3.33%)
Volume$76.07K
Capitalization60.82B
BAESF vs RNMBY Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAESF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RNMBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAESF vs. RNMBY commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAESF is a Hold and RNMBY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BAESF: $21.30 vs. RNMBY: $295.49)
Brand notoriety: BAESF and RNMBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Aerospace & Defense industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAESF: 55% vs. RNMBY: 86%
Market capitalization -- BAESF: $59.47B vs. RNMBY: $60.82B
BAESF [@Aerospace & Defense] is valued at $59.47B. RNMBY’s [@Aerospace & Defense] market capitalization is $60.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry ranges from $200.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry is $17.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAESF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRNMBY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAESF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RNMBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BAESF and RNMBY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAESF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RNMBY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAESF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RNMBY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BAESF and RNMBY are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BAESF (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +4.46% price change this week, while RNMBY (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +1.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was -3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Aerospace & Defense (-3.15% weekly)

Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNMBY($60.8B) and BAESF($59.5B) have the same market capitalization . RNMBY has higher P/E ratio than BAESF: RNMBY (73.10) vs BAESF (25.72). RNMBY YTD gains are higher at: 133.497 vs. BAESF (39.978). BAESF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.97B vs. RNMBY (1.54B). BAESF has more cash in the bank: 3.38B vs. RNMBY (474M). BAESF has higher revenues than RNMBY: BAESF (26.3B) vs RNMBY (8.83B).
BAESFRNMBYBAESF / RNMBY
Capitalization59.5B60.8B98%
EBITDA3.97B1.54B258%
Gain YTD39.978133.49730%
P/E Ratio25.7273.1035%
Revenue26.3B8.83B298%
Total Cash3.38B474M713%
Total Debt10.2BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAESF vs RNMBY: Fundamental Ratings
BAESF
RNMBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6088
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62
SMR RATING
1..100
9850
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3934
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3713
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAESF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RNMBY (83). This means that BAESF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RNMBY’s over the last 12 months.

RNMBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as BAESF (6). This means that RNMBY’s stock grew similarly to BAESF’s over the last 12 months.

RNMBY's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAESF (98). This means that RNMBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAESF’s over the last 12 months.

RNMBY's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as BAESF (39). This means that RNMBY’s stock grew similarly to BAESF’s over the last 12 months.

RNMBY's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as BAESF (37). This means that RNMBY’s stock grew similarly to BAESF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAESFRNMBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAESF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RNMBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LGCVX16.56N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Global Equity R5
HFESX46.98N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson European Focus S
ZIFIX11.02N/A
N/A
American Beacon Ninety One Int Frn R5
BIGIX27.55N/A
N/A
William Blair International Growth I
OIGAX32.24N/A
N/A
Invesco Oppenheimer International Gr A

BAESF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAESF has been loosely correlated with BAESY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAESF jumps, then BAESY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAESF
1D Price
Change %
BAESF100%
-0.29%
BAESY - BAESF
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
FINMY - BAESF
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.48%
RNMBY - BAESF
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.33%
THLLY - BAESF
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
MTUAY - BAESF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
More

RNMBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RNMBY has been closely correlated with RNMBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RNMBY jumps, then RNMBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RNMBY
1D Price
Change %
RNMBY100%
+4.78%
RNMBF - RNMBY
75%
Closely correlated
+5.67%
FINMY - RNMBY
60%
Loosely correlated
+4.75%
BAESY - RNMBY
56%
Loosely correlated
+3.32%
THLLY - RNMBY
55%
Loosely correlated
+4.09%
BAESF - RNMBY
39%
Loosely correlated
+4.67%
More