Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFHX vs FHJUX
BAFHX vs FHJUX Comparison
Open Charts BAFHX vs FHJUX
Brown Advisory WMC Strat Eurp Eq Instl
Price$18.54
Change-$0.06 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets744.72M
Fidelity Advisor Europe A
Price$46.46
Change-$0.36 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets937.7M
BAFHX vs FHJUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFHX vs. FHJUX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFHX is a Hold and FHJUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHJUX has more cash in the bank: 938M vs. BAFHX (745M). FHJUX pays higher dividends than BAFHX: FHJUX (2.23) vs BAFHX (1.50). BAFHX was incepted earlier than FHJUX: BAFHX (12 years) vs FHJUX (12 years). BAFHX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FHJUX (0.92). BAFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FHJUX (31.00). FHJUX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFHX: FHJUX (0) vs BAFHX (1000000). BAFHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.32 vs. FHJUX (27.15). BAFHX return over 5 years is better than : 74.13 vs. FHJUX (33.29).
| BAFHX | FHJUX | BAFHX / FHJUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.92 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.92 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 42.093 | 34.928 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 745M | 938M | 79% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 2.23 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.32 | 27.15 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 113.90 | 85.53 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.13 | 33.29 | 223% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.57 | 37.60 | 267% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement