Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFHX vs FHJUX
BAFHX vs FHJUX Comparison
Open Charts BAFHX vs FHJUX
Brown Advisory WMC Strat Eurp Eq Instl
Price$18.33
Change+$0.07 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets697.75M
Fidelity Advisor Europe A
Price$44.71
Change-$0.03 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets891M
BAFHX vs FHJUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFHX vs. FHJUX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFHX is a Buy and FHJUX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHJUX has more cash in the bank: 891M vs. BAFHX (698M). FHJUX pays higher dividends than BAFHX: FHJUX (2.32) vs BAFHX (1.54). BAFHX was incepted earlier than FHJUX: BAFHX (12 years) vs FHJUX (11 years). BAFHX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FHJUX (0.92). BAFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FHJUX (31.00). FHJUX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFHX: FHJUX (0) vs BAFHX (1000000). BAFHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.53 vs. FHJUX (21.57). BAFHX return over 5 years is better than : 77.28 vs. FHJUX (38.58).
| BAFHX | FHJUX | BAFHX / FHJUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.92 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.92 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 39.496 | 28.934 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 698M | 891M | 78% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 2.32 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.53 | 21.57 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.05 | 63.26 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.28 | 38.58 | 200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.24 | 24.14 | 378% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement