Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFHX vs FHJUX
BAFHX vs FHJUX Comparison
Open Charts BAFHX vs FHJUX
Brown Advisory WMC Strat Eurp Eq Instl
Price$18.81
Change-$0.07 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets752.81M
Fidelity Advisor Europe A
Price$45.35
Change-$0.12 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets913.46M
BAFHX vs FHJUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFHX vs. FHJUX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFHX is a Hold and FHJUX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHJUX has more cash in the bank: 913M vs. BAFHX (753M). FHJUX pays higher dividends than BAFHX: FHJUX (2.30) vs BAFHX (1.51). BAFHX was incepted earlier than FHJUX: BAFHX (12 years) vs FHJUX (12 years). BAFHX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FHJUX (0.92). BAFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FHJUX (31.00). FHJUX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFHX: FHJUX (0) vs BAFHX (1000000). BAFHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.53 vs. FHJUX (21.62). BAFHX return over 5 years is better than : 75.63 vs. FHJUX (30.97).
| BAFHX | FHJUX | BAFHX / FHJUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.92 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.92 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 43.697 | 30.692 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 753M | 913M | 82% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 2.30 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.53 | 21.62 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 98.66 | 65.37 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.63 | 30.97 | 244% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.87 | 35.59 | 309% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement