Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFMX vs RRMGX
BAFMX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts BAFMX vs RRMGX
Brown Advisory Mid-Cap Growth Instl
Price$18.36
Change-$0.06 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.67M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$89.74
Change-$0.07 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27B
BAFMX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFMX vs. RRMGX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFMX is a Hold and RRMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 27B vs. BAFMX (69.7M). BAFMX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . BAFMX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: BAFMX (7 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). RRMGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than BAFMX (0.85). BAFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RRMGX (22.60). RRMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFMX: RRMGX (2500) vs BAFMX (1000000). BAFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.27 vs. RRMGX (-7.15). BAFMX return over 5 years is better than : 23.96 vs. RRMGX (-3.25).
| BAFMX | RRMGX | BAFMX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.29 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.29 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.059 | 2.150 | 421% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.7M | 27B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.27 | -7.15 | -199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.46 | 9.36 | 453% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.96 | -3.25 | -736% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.56 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement