BAFN
Price
$14.10
Change
+$0.45 (+3.30%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
53.23M
PBHC
Price
$15.16
Change
-$0.34 (-2.19%)
Updated
Apr 17, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
75.52M
Ad is loading...

BAFN vs PBHC

Header iconBAFN vs PBHC Comparison
Open Charts BAFN vs PBHCBanner chart's image
BayFirst Financial
Price$14.10
Change+$0.45 (+3.30%)
Volume$2.97K
Capitalization53.23M
Pathfinder Ban
Price$15.16
Change-$0.34 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization75.52M
BAFN vs PBHC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAFN vs. PBHC commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFN is a Hold and PBHC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BAFN: $14.10 vs. PBHC: $15.50)
Brand notoriety: BAFN and PBHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAFN: 31% vs. PBHC: 25%
Market capitalization -- BAFN: $53.23M vs. PBHC: $75.52M
BAFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $53.23M. PBHC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $75.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAFN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePBHC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAFN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PBHC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PBHC is a better buy in the long-term than BAFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAFN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BAFN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BAFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.17% price change this week, while PBHC (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAFN is expected to report earnings on Apr 27, 2023.

PBHC is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBHC($75.5M) has a higher market cap than BAFN($53.2M). BAFN has higher P/E ratio than PBHC: BAFN (10.74) vs PBHC (7.85). BAFN YTD gains are higher at: 6.486 vs. PBHC (-10.303). PBHC has more cash in the bank: 22.5M vs. BAFN (4.5M). BAFN has less debt than PBHC: BAFN (11.3M) vs PBHC (212M). BAFN has higher revenues than PBHC: BAFN (73.7M) vs PBHC (43.1M).
BAFNPBHCBAFN / PBHC
Capitalization53.2M75.5M70%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.486-10.303-63%
P/E Ratio10.747.85137%
Revenue73.7M43.1M171%
Total Cash4.5M22.5M20%
Total Debt11.3M212M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PBHC: Fundamental Ratings
PBHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
56
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48
SMR RATING
1..100
24
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAFN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HSMSX11.22N/A
N/A
Hartford Small Cap Value R4
HNRIX25.58N/A
N/A
Hennessy Energy Transition Instl
GRMIX24.83N/A
N/A
Nationwide S&P 500 Index R6
MSGNX5.45N/A
N/A
MassMutual Small Cap Gr Eq R3
JEPCX13.30N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income C

BAFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BAFN and ALRS have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BAFN and ALRS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAFN
1D Price
Change %
BAFN100%
+3.30%
ALRS - BAFN
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
COLB - BAFN
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
BANFP - BAFN
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
CBFV - BAFN
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
BBDO - BAFN
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
More