BAFN
Price
$9.41
Change
+$0.11 (+1.18%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
38.9M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
PBHC
Price
$14.86
Change
+$0.21 (+1.43%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
91.66M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAFN vs PBHC

Header iconBAFN vs PBHC Comparison
Open Charts BAFN vs PBHCBanner chart's image
BayFirst Financial
Price$9.41
Change+$0.11 (+1.18%)
Volume$1.86K
Capitalization38.9M
Pathfinder Ban
Price$14.86
Change+$0.21 (+1.43%)
Volume$6.35K
Capitalization91.66M
BAFN vs PBHC Comparison Chart in %
BAFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAFN vs. PBHC commentary
Oct 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFN is a Hold and PBHC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BAFN: $9.41 vs. PBHC: $14.86)
Brand notoriety: BAFN and PBHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAFN: 12% vs. PBHC: 108%
Market capitalization -- BAFN: $38.9M vs. PBHC: $91.66M
BAFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $38.9M. PBHC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $91.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAFN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePBHC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BAFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PBHC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAFN is a better buy in the long-term than PBHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAFN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBHC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAFN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PBHC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BAFN and PBHC are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BAFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.05% price change this week, while PBHC (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +7.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+7.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBHC($91.7M) has a higher market cap than BAFN($38.9M). PBHC has higher P/E ratio than BAFN: PBHC (42.46) vs BAFN (5.14). PBHC YTD gains are higher at: -12.870 vs. BAFN (-28.577). PBHC has more cash in the bank: 16.2M vs. BAFN (4.5M). BAFN has less debt than PBHC: BAFN (61.5M) vs PBHC (145M). BAFN has higher revenues than PBHC: BAFN (79.6M) vs PBHC (46.7M).
BAFNPBHCBAFN / PBHC
Capitalization38.9M91.7M42%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-28.577-12.870222%
P/E Ratio5.1442.4612%
Revenue79.6M46.7M170%
Total Cash4.5M16.2M28%
Total Debt61.5M145M42%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAFN vs PBHC: Fundamental Ratings
BAFN
PBHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9494
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10060
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6561
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9977
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAFN's Valuation (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PBHC (90) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BAFN’s stock grew significantly faster than PBHC’s over the last 12 months.

PBHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAFN (100) in the null industry. This means that PBHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAFN’s over the last 12 months.

PBHC's SMR Rating (100) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BAFN (100) in the null industry. This means that PBHC’s stock grew similarly to BAFN’s over the last 12 months.

PBHC's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BAFN (65) in the null industry. This means that PBHC’s stock grew similarly to BAFN’s over the last 12 months.

PBHC's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BAFN (99) in the null industry. This means that PBHC’s stock grew similarly to BAFN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAFNPBHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLNFF11.990.17
+1.44%
High Liner Foods Inc.
IDBHF5.00N/A
N/A
Industrias Bachoco S.A.B. de C.V.
IDTA0.18N/A
N/A
Identa Corp.
PTXLF3.40N/A
N/A
PTT Exploration & Production Public Co., Ltd.
RDGL0.07-0.01
-9.41%
Vivos Inc.

BAFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BAFN and COLB have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BAFN and COLB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAFN
1D Price
Change %
BAFN100%
+1.18%
COLB - BAFN
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
BANFP - BAFN
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
CBFV - BAFN
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.97%
BBDO - BAFN
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
PBHC - BAFN
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
More

PBHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PBHC and ANDC have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBHC and ANDC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBHC
1D Price
Change %
PBHC100%
+1.43%
ANDC - PBHC
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOTJ - PBHC
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
MBBC - PBHC
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
BAFN - PBHC
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
HNVR - PBHC
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
More