BAFN
Price
$10.38
Change
+$0.29 (+2.87%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
42.89M
PBHC
Price
$15.30
Change
+$0.08 (+0.53%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
93.88M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAFN vs PBHC

Header iconBAFN vs PBHC Comparison
Open Charts BAFN vs PBHCBanner chart's image
BayFirst Financial
Price$10.38
Change+$0.29 (+2.87%)
Volume$3.2K
Capitalization42.89M
Pathfinder Ban
Price$15.30
Change+$0.08 (+0.53%)
Volume$1.12K
Capitalization93.88M
BAFN vs PBHC Comparison Chart in %
BAFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAFN vs. PBHC commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFN is a Buy and PBHC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BAFN: $10.38 vs. PBHC: $15.30)
Brand notoriety: BAFN and PBHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAFN: 20% vs. PBHC: 26%
Market capitalization -- BAFN: $42.89M vs. PBHC: $93.88M
BAFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $42.89M. PBHC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $93.88M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAFN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePBHC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BAFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PBHC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAFN is a better buy in the long-term than PBHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAFN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBHC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAFN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PBHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PBHC is a better buy in the short-term than BAFN.

Price Growth

BAFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +16.57% price change this week, while PBHC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBHC($93.9M) has a higher market cap than BAFN($42.9M). PBHC has higher P/E ratio than BAFN: PBHC (43.49) vs BAFN (5.51). PBHC YTD gains are higher at: -10.876 vs. BAFN (-21.252). PBHC has more cash in the bank: 18.6M vs. BAFN (4.5M). BAFN has less debt than PBHC: BAFN (61.5M) vs PBHC (145M). BAFN has higher revenues than PBHC: BAFN (79.6M) vs PBHC (46.7M).
BAFNPBHCBAFN / PBHC
Capitalization42.9M93.9M46%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-21.252-10.876195%
P/E Ratio5.5143.4913%
Revenue79.6M46.7M170%
Total Cash4.5M18.6M24%
Total Debt61.5M145M42%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAFN vs PBHC: Fundamental Ratings
BAFN
PBHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4362
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8758
SMR RATING
1..100
5781
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6358
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9975
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAFN's Valuation (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PBHC (90) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BAFN’s stock grew significantly faster than PBHC’s over the last 12 months.

PBHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BAFN (87) in the null industry. This means that PBHC’s stock grew similarly to BAFN’s over the last 12 months.

BAFN's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as PBHC (81) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BAFN’s stock grew similarly to PBHC’s over the last 12 months.

PBHC's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BAFN (63) in the null industry. This means that PBHC’s stock grew similarly to BAFN’s over the last 12 months.

PBHC's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BAFN (99) in the null industry. This means that PBHC’s stock grew similarly to BAFN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAFNPBHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RBOT7.061.51
+27.21%
Vicarious Surgical
BRY3.820.12
+3.24%
Berry Corp
FUBO3.960.01
+0.25%
fuboTV
T27.060.05
+0.19%
AT&T
GTES25.74-0.01
-0.04%
Gates Industrial Corp

PBHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PBHC and ANDC have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBHC and ANDC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBHC
1D Price
Change %
PBHC100%
+0.53%
ANDC - PBHC
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOTJ - PBHC
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
MBBC - PBHC
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
BAFN - PBHC
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.82%
HNVR - PBHC
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
More