Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFQX vs RNWFX
BAFQX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts BAFQX vs RNWFX
Brown Advisory Emgerg Mkts Select Inst
Price$14.24
Change+$0.06 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets736.55M
American Funds New World R5
Price$95.46
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.08B
BAFQX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFQX vs. RNWFX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFQX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. BAFQX (737M). BAFQX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: BAFQX (1.71) vs RNWFX (1.01). BAFQX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: BAFQX (13 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). BAFQX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). BAFQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFQX: RNWFX (250) vs BAFQX (1000000). BAFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.61 vs. RNWFX (17.17). BAFQX return over 5 years is better than : 52.34 vs. RNWFX (32.52).
| BAFQX | RNWFX | BAFQX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.62 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.62 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.984 | 23.557 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 737M | 74.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 1.01 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.61 | 17.17 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.45 | 50.26 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.34 | 32.52 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.14 | 98.91 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement