Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFQX vs RNWHX
BAFQX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BAFQX vs RNWHX
Brown Advisory Emgerg Mkts Select Inst
Price$12.95
Change+$0.06 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets668.2M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.24
Change+$0.44 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.96B
BAFQX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFQX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFQX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70B vs. BAFQX (668M). BAFQX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BAFQX (1.77) vs RNWHX (0.99). BAFQX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BAFQX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BAFQX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). BAFQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFQX: RNWHX (250) vs BAFQX (1000000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.72 vs. BAFQX (9.87). BAFQX return over 5 years is better than : 44.07 vs. RNWHX (28.81).
| BAFQX | RNWHX | BAFQX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.72 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.72 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.795 | 16.075 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 668M | 70B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 0.99 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.87 | 10.72 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.47 | 38.05 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.07 | 28.81 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement