Ad is loading...
BAFQX vs RNWHX
BAFQX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BAFQX vs RNWHX
Brown Advisory Emgerg Mkts Select Inst
Price$11.71
Change+$0.08 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets613.77M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$77.82
Change+$0.84 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.47B
BAFQX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFQX vs. RNWHX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFQX is a Sell and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 61.5B vs. BAFQX (614M). BAFQX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BAFQX (1.93) vs RNWHX (1.12). BAFQX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BAFQX (12 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). BAFQX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). BAFQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFQX: RNWHX (250) vs BAFQX (1000000). BAFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.53 vs. RNWHX (2.65). BAFQX return over 5 years is better than : 55.99 vs. RNWHX (39.59).
| BAFQX | RNWHX | BAFQX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.72 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.72 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.867 | 2.368 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 614M | 61.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 1.12 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.53 | 2.65 | 246% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.05 | 13.21 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.99 | 39.59 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.02 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers