Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFQX vs RNWHX
BAFQX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts BAFQX vs RNWHX
Brown Advisory Emgerg Mkts Select Inst
Price$12.58
Change-$0.18 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets666.8M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$84.97
Change-$1.04 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.56B
BAFQX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFQX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFQX is a Sell and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 68.6B vs. BAFQX (667M). BAFQX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: BAFQX (1.86) vs RNWHX (1.04). BAFQX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: BAFQX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). BAFQX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). BAFQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFQX: RNWHX (250) vs BAFQX (1000000). BAFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.66 vs. RNWHX (8.20). BAFQX return over 5 years is better than : 53.36 vs. RNWHX (33.47).
| BAFQX | RNWHX | BAFQX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.72 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.72 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.668 | 11.773 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 667M | 68.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.04 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.66 | 8.20 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.73 | 35.09 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.36 | 33.47 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.92 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers