Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFWX vs RGAGX
BAFWX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts BAFWX vs RGAGX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth I
Price$57.80
Change+$0.36 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.99B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$82.00
Change+$0.67 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets316.89B
BAFWX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFWX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFWX is a Buy and RGAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 317B vs. BAFWX (8.99B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than BAFWX: RGAGX (0.65) vs BAFWX (0.00). BAFWX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: BAFWX (13 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). BAFWX (0.61) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). BAFWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFWX: RGAGX (250) vs BAFWX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.10 vs. BAFWX (4.38). BAFWX return over 5 years is better than : 85.43 vs. RGAGX (56.69).
| BAFWX | RGAGX | BAFWX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.30 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.30 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.228 | 9.993 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.99B | 317B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.38 | 11.10 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.27 | 57.78 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.43 | 56.69 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 266.13 | 86.49 | 308% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers