Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFWX vs RGAGX
BAFWX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts BAFWX vs RGAGX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth I
Price$58.19
Change-$0.25 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.66B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$85.36
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
BAFWX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFWX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFWX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. BAFWX (8.66B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than BAFWX: RGAGX (0.60) vs BAFWX (0.00). BAFWX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: BAFWX (13 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). BAFWX (0.61) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). BAFWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFWX: RGAGX (250) vs BAFWX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.11 vs. BAFWX (6.67). BAFWX return over 5 years is better than : 70.76 vs. RGAGX (46.14).
| BAFWX | RGAGX | BAFWX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.30 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.30 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.589 | 14.500 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.66B | 329B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.60 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | 15.11 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.66 | 43.78 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.76 | 46.14 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 250.37 | 90.14 | 278% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement