Ad is loading...
BAFWX vs RGAGX
BAFWX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts BAFWX vs RGAGX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth I
Price$44.68
Change+$0.29 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.35B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$63.31
Change+$0.18 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.76B
BAFWX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFWX vs. RGAGX commentary
Apr 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFWX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 249B vs. BAFWX (7.35B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than BAFWX: RGAGX (0.71) vs BAFWX (0.00). BAFWX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: BAFWX (13 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). BAFWX (0.61) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). BAFWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFWX: RGAGX (250) vs BAFWX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.41 vs. BAFWX (-14.70). BAFWX return over 5 years is better than : 86.14 vs. RGAGX (54.21).
| BAFWX | RGAGX | BAFWX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.30 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.30 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.452 | -15.319 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.35B | 249B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.71 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.70 | -9.41 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.78 | -3.73 | -48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.14 | 54.21 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 185.86 | 44.83 | 415% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...