Ad is loading...
BAICX vs FFANX
BAICX vs FFANX Comparison
Open Charts BAICX vs FFANX
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Investor A
Price$10.14
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.23B
Fidelity Asset Manager 40%
Price$13.05
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.2B
BAICX vs FFANX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAICX vs. FFANX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAICX is a Buy and FFANX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAICX has more cash in the bank: 10.2B vs. FFANX (2.2B). BAICX pays higher dividends than FFANX: BAICX (5.81) vs FFANX (2.73). BAICX was incepted earlier than FFANX: BAICX (17 years) vs FFANX (18 years). BAICX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FFANX (0.51). BAICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FFANX (13.00). FFANX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAICX: FFANX (0) vs BAICX (1000). FFANX IRA initial investment is lower compared to BAICX: FFANX (500) vs BAICX (100). BAICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.22 vs. FFANX (5.68). BAICX return over 5 years is better than : 29.02 vs. FFANX (26.27).
| BAICX | FFANX | BAICX / FFANX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.51 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.51 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.397 | 1.338 | 179% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | 500 | 20% |
| Net Assets | 10.2B | 2.2B | 464% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.81 | 2.73 | 212% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.22 | 5.68 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.92 | 15.12 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.02 | 26.27 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.81 | 40.67 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers