Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAICX vs RMYCX
BAICX vs RMYCX Comparison
Open Charts BAICX vs RMYCX
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Investor A
Price$10.54
Change+$0.04 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.57B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income C
Price$9.80
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.47M
BAICX vs RMYCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAICX vs. RMYCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAICX is a StrongBuy and RMYCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAICX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. RMYCX (292M). BAICX pays higher dividends than RMYCX: BAICX (5.56) vs RMYCX (4.66). BAICX was incepted earlier than RMYCX: BAICX (17 years) vs RMYCX (10 years). RMYCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than BAICX (0.92). RMYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. BAICX (83.00). RMYCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAICX: RMYCX (0) vs BAICX (1000). BAICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.65 vs. RMYCX (6.22). BAICX return over 5 years is better than : 27.26 vs. RMYCX (15.87).
| BAICX | RMYCX | BAICX / RMYCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.75 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.92 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.700 | 9.397 | 93% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 292M | 3,630% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.56 | 4.66 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.65 | 6.22 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.08 | 25.11 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.26 | 15.87 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.84 | 31.37 | 191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers