Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAICX vs RMYCX
BAICX vs RMYCX Comparison
Open Charts BAICX vs RMYCX
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Investor A
Price$10.29
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.35B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income C
Price$9.52
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.16M
BAICX vs RMYCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAICX vs. RMYCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAICX is a Buy and RMYCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAICX has more cash in the bank: 10.4B vs. RMYCX (286M). BAICX pays higher dividends than RMYCX: BAICX (5.74) vs RMYCX (4.60). BAICX was incepted earlier than RMYCX: BAICX (17 years) vs RMYCX (10 years). RMYCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than BAICX (0.92). RMYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. BAICX (83.00). RMYCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAICX: RMYCX (0) vs BAICX (1000). BAICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.60 vs. RMYCX (6.53). BAICX return over 5 years is better than : 25.73 vs. RMYCX (11.07).
| BAICX | RMYCX | BAICX / RMYCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.75 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.92 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.465 | 4.765 | 94% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.4B | 286M | 3,636% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.74 | 4.60 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.60 | 6.53 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.56 | 12.03 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.73 | 11.07 | 232% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.18 | 21.32 | 235% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement