BAINF
Price
$2.27
Change
-$0.33 (-12.69%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
284.34M
DYNDF
Price
$7.66
Change
-$0.07 (-0.91%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
515.73M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAINF vs DYNDF

Header iconBAINF vs DYNDF Comparison
Open Charts BAINF vs DYNDFBanner chart's image
Base
Price$2.27
Change-$0.33 (-12.69%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization284.34M
DYE & DURHAM
Price$7.66
Change-$0.07 (-0.91%)
Volume$4.45K
Capitalization515.73M
BAINF vs DYNDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BAINF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DYNDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAINF vs. DYNDF commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAINF is a Hold and DYNDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BAINF: $2.27 vs. DYNDF: $7.66)
Brand notoriety: BAINF and DYNDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAINF: 30% vs. DYNDF: 114%
Market capitalization -- BAINF: $284.34M vs. DYNDF: $515.73M
BAINF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $284.34M. DYNDF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $515.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $313.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAINF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDYNDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAINF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DYNDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DYNDF is a better buy in the long-term than BAINF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAINF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DYNDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAINF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • DYNDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DYNDF is a better buy in the short-term than BAINF.

Price Growth

BAINF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DYNDF (@Packaged Software) price change was +4.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.85% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DYNDF($516M) has a higher market cap than BAINF($284M). BAINF YTD gains are higher at: 11.111 vs. DYNDF (-36.559). DYNDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 143M vs. BAINF (36M). BAINF has more cash in the bank: 19.2B vs. DYNDF (37M). BAINF has less debt than DYNDF: BAINF (407M) vs DYNDF (1.67B). BAINF has higher revenues than DYNDF: BAINF (17.8B) vs DYNDF (469M).
BAINFDYNDFBAINF / DYNDF
Capitalization284M516M55%
EBITDA36M143M25%
Gain YTD11.111-36.559-30%
P/E Ratio116.68N/A-
Revenue17.8B469M3,795%
Total Cash19.2B37M51,892%
Total Debt407M1.67B24%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAINFDYNDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAINF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DYNDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SVIFX9.44N/A
N/A
Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity C
CUURX56.19N/A
N/A
Columbia Small Cap Value Discv Inst 2
LAMGX17.91N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth A
GIIGX24.14N/A
N/A
Gabelli International Growth I
PIIDX15.48N/A
N/A
Principal International Equity R-6

BAINF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAINF has been loosely correlated with INSSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAINF jumps, then INSSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAINF
1D Price
Change %
BAINF100%
N/A
INSSF - BAINF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GEHC - BAINF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%
KNAMF - BAINF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFIV - BAINF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
DYNDF - BAINF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
More

DYNDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DYNDF and VRNT have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DYNDF and VRNT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DYNDF
1D Price
Change %
DYNDF100%
-0.85%
VRNT - DYNDF
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
SDGR - DYNDF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.66%
SHOP - DYNDF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.52%
WRDLY - DYNDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.95%
STNE - DYNDF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
More