BAK
Price
$3.68
Change
+$0.10 (+2.79%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
4.13B
3 days until earnings call
GNENF
Price
$2.35
Change
-$0.06 (-2.49%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
16.15B
Ad is loading...

BAK vs GNENF

Header iconBAK vs GNENF Comparison
Open Charts BAK vs GNENFBanner chart's image
Braskem SA
Price$3.68
Change+$0.10 (+2.79%)
Volume$488.95K
Capitalization4.13B
Ganfeng Lithium Group
Price$2.35
Change-$0.06 (-2.49%)
Volume$2.4K
Capitalization16.15B
BAK vs GNENF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAK vs. GNENF commentary
May 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAK is a Hold and GNENF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BAK: $3.68 vs. GNENF: $2.35)
Brand notoriety: BAK and GNENF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAK: 56% vs. GNENF: 59%
Market capitalization -- BAK: $4.13B vs. GNENF: $16.15B
BAK [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $4.13B. GNENF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $16.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGNENF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GNENF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAK is a better buy in the long-term than GNENF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BAK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BAK (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -6.84% price change this week, while GNENF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +0.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAK is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

GNENF is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+1.77% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNENF($16.2B) has a higher market cap than BAK($4.13B). BAK has higher P/E ratio than GNENF: BAK (7.45) vs GNENF (4.79). BAK YTD gains are higher at: -4.663 vs. GNENF (-10.816). GNENF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 21.6B vs. BAK (3.28B). BAK has more cash in the bank: 18.7B vs. GNENF (9.1B). GNENF has less debt than BAK: GNENF (18.1B) vs BAK (60B). BAK has higher revenues than GNENF: BAK (72.9B) vs GNENF (45.9B).
BAKGNENFBAK / GNENF
Capitalization4.13B16.2B25%
EBITDA3.28B21.6B15%
Gain YTD-4.663-10.81643%
P/E Ratio7.454.79155%
Revenue72.9B45.9B159%
Total Cash18.7B9.1B205%
Total Debt60B18.1B331%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAK vs GNENF: Fundamental Ratings
BAK
GNENF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9891
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8580
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
512
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8548

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAK's Valuation (39) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GNENF (89) in the null industry. This means that BAK’s stock grew somewhat faster than GNENF’s over the last 12 months.

BAK's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as GNENF (100) in the null industry. This means that BAK’s stock grew similarly to GNENF’s over the last 12 months.

GNENF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as BAK (98) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that GNENF’s stock grew similarly to BAK’s over the last 12 months.

GNENF's Price Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as BAK (85) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that GNENF’s stock grew similarly to BAK’s over the last 12 months.

BAK's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as GNENF (12) in the null industry. This means that BAK’s stock grew similarly to GNENF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YCL23.180.17
+0.74%
ProShares Ultra Yen
AAAU31.950.05
+0.17%
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
MDCP26.83N/A
N/A
VictoryShares THB Mid Cap ETF
NUBD21.98-0.07
-0.29%
Nuveen ESG US Aggregate Bond ETF
XSVN47.38-0.50
-1.04%
BondBloxx Bloomberg SevenYrTrgDurUSTrETF

GNENF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNENF has been loosely correlated with GNENY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GNENF jumps, then GNENY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GNENF
1D Price
Change %
GNENF100%
-2.69%
GNENY - GNENF
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SQM - GNENF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
ALB - GNENF
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
BAK - GNENF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.79%
NDEKY - GNENF
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.35%
More