Advertisement
BAK vs GNENF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAK is a StrongBuy and GNENF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BAK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGNENF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BAK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GNENF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BAK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GNENF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BAK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- GNENF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BAK (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) experienced а +14.85% price change this week, while GNENF (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) price change was -4.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Major Diversified industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.58%.
Reported Earning Dates
BAK is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Major Diversified (-0.34% weekly)The major diversified chemicals industry includes companies that produce a wide range of chemicals and industrial gases. The products are often used as raw materials in the manufacturing of various types of goods, including plastics, paints, carpets, and fixtures to name a few. Major companies making diversified chemicals include DuPont de Nemours Inc., Celanese Corporation, Celanese Corporation and Westlake Chemical Corporation.
| BAK | GNENF | BAK / GNENF | |
| Capitalization | 1.4B | 10.6B | 13% |
| EBITDA | 1.08B | -1.17B | -92% |
| Gain YTD | -9.845 | 47.628 | -21% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 15.71 | - |
| Revenue | 77.7B | 17.6B | 441% |
| Total Cash | 10.3B | 7.06B | 146% |
| Total Debt | 65.4B | 35.1B | 186% |
BAK | GNENF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BAK's Valuation (35) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GNENF (99) in the null industry. This means that BAK’s stock grew somewhat faster than GNENF’s over the last 12 months.
BAK's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as GNENF (100) in the null industry. This means that BAK’s stock grew similarly to GNENF’s over the last 12 months.
BAK's SMR Rating (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as GNENF (100) in the null industry. This means that BAK’s stock grew similarly to GNENF’s over the last 12 months.
GNENF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as BAK (63) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that GNENF’s stock grew similarly to BAK’s over the last 12 months.
GNENF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BAK (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that GNENF’s stock grew similarly to BAK’s over the last 12 months.
| BAK | GNENF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 12 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
Advertisement
BAK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAK has been loosely correlated with AVNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAK jumps, then AVNT could also see price increases.
GNENF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNENF has been loosely correlated with GNENY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GNENF jumps, then GNENY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GNENF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNENF | 100% | -0.38% | ||
| GNENY - GNENF | 51% Loosely correlated | -8.37% | ||
| SQM - GNENF | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| ALB - GNENF | 33% Loosely correlated | -3.15% | ||
| BAK - GNENF | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NDEKY - GNENF | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.40% | ||
More | ||||