BAK
Price
$2.55
Change
-$0.05 (-1.92%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
1.08B
26 days until earnings call
GNENF
Price
$6.43
Change
+$0.05 (+0.78%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
18.09B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAK vs GNENF

Header iconBAK vs GNENF Comparison
Open Charts BAK vs GNENFBanner chart's image
Braskem SA
Price$2.55
Change-$0.05 (-1.92%)
Volume$734.62K
Capitalization1.08B
Ganfeng Lithium Group
Price$6.43
Change+$0.05 (+0.78%)
Volume$4.73K
Capitalization18.09B
BAK vs GNENF Comparison Chart in %
BAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GNENF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAK vs. GNENF commentary
Oct 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAK is a StrongBuy and GNENF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 10, 2025
Stock price -- (BAK: $2.55 vs. GNENF: $6.43)
Brand notoriety: BAK and GNENF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAK: 66% vs. GNENF: 38%
Market capitalization -- BAK: $1.08B vs. GNENF: $18.09B
BAK [@Chemicals: Major Diversified] is valued at $1.08B. GNENF’s [@Chemicals: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $18.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $63.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Major Diversified] industry is $7.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGNENF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GNENF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BAK and GNENF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GNENF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GNENF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GNENF is a better buy in the short-term than BAK.

Price Growth

BAK (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) experienced а +1.59% price change this week, while GNENF (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) price change was +5.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Major Diversified industry was +2.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAK is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Major Diversified (+2.57% weekly)

The major diversified chemicals industry includes companies that produce a wide range of chemicals and industrial gases. The products are often used as raw materials in the manufacturing of various types of goods, including plastics, paints, carpets, and fixtures to name a few. Major companies making diversified chemicals include DuPont de Nemours Inc., Celanese Corporation, Celanese Corporation and Westlake Chemical Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNENF($18.1B) has a higher market cap than BAK($1.08B). GNENF YTD gains are higher at: 144.023 vs. BAK (-33.938). BAK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.08B vs. GNENF (712M). BAK (10.3B) and GNENF (10.1B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . GNENF has less debt than BAK: GNENF (38.5B) vs BAK (65.4B). BAK has higher revenues than GNENF: BAK (77.7B) vs GNENF (17.7B).
BAKGNENFBAK / GNENF
Capitalization1.08B18.1B6%
EBITDA1.08B712M152%
Gain YTD-33.938144.023-24%
P/E RatioN/A15.71-
Revenue77.7B17.7B439%
Total Cash10.3B10.1B102%
Total Debt65.4B38.5B170%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAK vs GNENF: Fundamental Ratings
BAK
GNENF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5028
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10083
SMR RATING
1..100
10093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9436
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
610
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5032

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAK's Valuation (34) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GNENF (99) in the null industry. This means that BAK’s stock grew somewhat faster than GNENF’s over the last 12 months.

GNENF's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as BAK (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that GNENF’s stock grew similarly to BAK’s over the last 12 months.

GNENF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as BAK (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that GNENF’s stock grew similarly to BAK’s over the last 12 months.

GNENF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAK (94) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that GNENF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAK’s over the last 12 months.

BAK's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as GNENF (10) in the null industry. This means that BAK’s stock grew similarly to GNENF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAKGNENF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GNENF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTEC228.72-0.06
-0.03%
Fidelity MSCI Information Tech ETF
DXYZ27.94-0.07
-0.25%
Destiny Tech100
XRLV54.77-0.40
-0.72%
Invesco S&P 500® ex-Rate Snsv LowVol ETF
BKCI52.12-0.61
-1.16%
BNY Mellon Concentrated Internatnl ETF
NANR64.36-1.13
-1.72%
SPDR S&P® North American Natural Res ETF

BAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAK has been loosely correlated with AVNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAK jumps, then AVNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAK
1D Price
Change %
BAK100%
-1.92%
AVNT - BAK
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
DOW - BAK
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
SCL - BAK
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
DD - BAK
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
LYB - BAK
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.09%
More

GNENF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNENF has been loosely correlated with GNENY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GNENF jumps, then GNENY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GNENF
1D Price
Change %
GNENF100%
+0.72%
GNENY - GNENF
51%
Loosely correlated
+5.12%
SQM - GNENF
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.96%
ALB - GNENF
33%
Loosely correlated
+5.25%
BAK - GNENF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
NDEKY - GNENF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
More