BAK vs GNENF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAK is a Hold and GNENF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BAK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGNENF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BAK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GNENF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BAK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GNENF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BAK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- GNENF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
BAK (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -11.62% price change this week, while GNENF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -17.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -4.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
BAK is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (-4.26% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| BAK | GNENF | BAK / GNENF | |
| Capitalization | 4.13B | 16.2B | 25% |
| EBITDA | 3.28B | 21.6B | 15% |
| Gain YTD | -15.285 | -16.858 | 91% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.45 | 4.79 | 155% |
| Revenue | 72.9B | 45.9B | 159% |
| Total Cash | 18.7B | 9.1B | 205% |
| Total Debt | 60B | 18.1B | 331% |
BAK | GNENF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 40 Fair valued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 92 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 84 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BAK's Valuation (40) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GNENF (90) in the null industry. This means that BAK’s stock grew somewhat faster than GNENF’s over the last 12 months.
GNENF's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as BAK (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that GNENF’s stock grew similarly to BAK’s over the last 12 months.
GNENF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as BAK (98) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that GNENF’s stock grew similarly to BAK’s over the last 12 months.
GNENF's Price Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as BAK (91) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that GNENF’s stock grew similarly to BAK’s over the last 12 months.
BAK's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as GNENF (9) in the null industry. This means that BAK’s stock grew similarly to GNENF’s over the last 12 months.
| BAK | GNENF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 24 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 24 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 24 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 24 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 24 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 74% | 29 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 24 days ago 78% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FDFF | 33.41 | 3.01 | +9.90% |
| Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF | |||
| TILT | 198.14 | 17.01 | +9.39% |
| FlexShares Mstar US Mkt Factors Tilt ETF | |||
| XPH | 38.86 | 2.04 | +5.54% |
| SPDR® S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF | |||
| HIO | 3.82 | 0.12 | +3.24% |
| Western Asset High Income Opportunity Fund | |||
| AMDS | 17.82 | -5.59 | -23.88% |
| GraniteShares 1x Short AMD Daily ETF | |||
BAK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAK has been loosely correlated with LYB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAK jumps, then LYB could also see price increases.
GNENF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNENF has been loosely correlated with GNENY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GNENF jumps, then GNENY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GNENF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNENF | 100% | +1.43% | ||
| GNENY - GNENF | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| SQM - GNENF | 38% Loosely correlated | +12.31% | ||
| ALB - GNENF | 33% Loosely correlated | +19.13% | ||
| BAK - GNENF | 28% Poorly correlated | +12.37% | ||
| NDEKY - GNENF | 26% Poorly correlated | +6.53% | ||
More | ||||