Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALFX vs WEBCX
BALFX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts BALFX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced F1
Price$37.57
Change-$0.14 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets255.46B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.61
Change-$0.05 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.72M
BALFX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALFX vs. WEBCX commentary
Sep 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALFX is a Buy and WEBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALFX has more cash in the bank: 255B vs. WEBCX (33.7M). BALFX pays higher dividends than WEBCX: BALFX (1.77) vs WEBCX (1.19). BALFX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: BALFX (24 years) vs WEBCX (32 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than BALFX (0.61). BALFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). BALFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: BALFX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). BALFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. WEBCX (-0.95). BALFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.77 vs. WEBCX (-0.78).
| BALFX | WEBCX | BALFX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.39 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.39 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.187 | 5.596 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 255B | 33.7M | 756,677% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 1.19 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.68 | -0.95 | -807% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.11 | 9.23 | 391% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.77 | -0.78 | -4,722% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.25 | -1.89 | -4,034% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement