Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALFX vs WEBCX
BALFX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts BALFX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced F1
Price$36.70
Change-$0.14 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.32B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.31
Change-$0.08 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.71M
BALFX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALFX vs. WEBCX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALFX is a Buy and WEBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALFX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. WEBCX (33.7M). BALFX pays higher dividends than WEBCX: BALFX (1.81) vs WEBCX (1.22). BALFX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: BALFX (24 years) vs WEBCX (32 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than BALFX (0.61). BALFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). BALFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: BALFX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). BALFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.96 vs. WEBCX (-1.65). BALFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.44 vs. WEBCX (0.49).
| BALFX | WEBCX | BALFX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.39 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.39 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.635 | 3.406 | 224% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 252B | 33.7M | 747,774% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 1.22 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | -1.65 | -362% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.86 | 9.57 | 364% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.44 | 0.49 | 7,900% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.45 | -10.20 | -602% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement