Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALFX vs WEBCX
BALFX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts BALFX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced F1
Price$35.80
Change+$0.21 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.2B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.21
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.32M
BALFX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALFX vs. WEBCX commentary
Jun 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALFX is a Buy and WEBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALFX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. WEBCX (33.3M). BALFX pays higher dividends than WEBCX: BALFX (1.88) vs WEBCX (1.23). BALFX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: BALFX (24 years) vs WEBCX (32 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than BALFX (0.61). BALFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). BALFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: BALFX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). BALFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.80 vs. WEBCX (-1.82). BALFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.59 vs. WEBCX (-0.31).
| BALFX | WEBCX | BALFX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.39 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.39 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.380 | 1.278 | 343% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 244B | 33.3M | 732,733% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 1.23 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.80 | -1.82 | -264% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.60 | 9.55 | 310% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.59 | -0.31 | -12,368% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.15 | -12.33 | -472% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement