Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALFX vs WEBCX
BALFX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts BALFX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced F1
Price$35.36
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets241.02B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.12
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.24M
BALFX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALFX vs. WEBCX commentary
Jun 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALFX is a Buy and WEBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALFX has more cash in the bank: 241B vs. WEBCX (33.2M). BALFX pays higher dividends than WEBCX: BALFX (1.88) vs WEBCX (1.23). BALFX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: BALFX (24 years) vs WEBCX (32 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than BALFX (0.61). BALFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). BALFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: BALFX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). BALFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.66 vs. WEBCX (-0.22). BALFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.83 vs. WEBCX (-1.10).
| BALFX | WEBCX | BALFX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.39 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.39 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.401 | 0.385 | 882% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 241B | 33.2M | 725,904% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 1.23 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.66 | -0.22 | -3,498% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.97 | 1.16 | 1,809% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.83 | -1.10 | -3,353% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.23 | -12.62 | -438% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement