Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALFX vs WEBCX
BALFX vs WEBCX Comparison
Open Charts BALFX vs WEBCX
American Funds American Balanced F1
Price$37.03
Change+$0.10 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.49B
TETON Westwood Balanced A
Price$10.52
Change+$0.05 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.55M
BALFX vs WEBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALFX vs. WEBCX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALFX is a Buy and WEBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALFX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. WEBCX (33.5M). BALFX pays higher dividends than WEBCX: BALFX (1.79) vs WEBCX (1.21). BALFX was incepted earlier than WEBCX: BALFX (24 years) vs WEBCX (32 years). WEBCX (1.39) is less costly to investors than BALFX (0.61). BALFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBCX (36.00). BALFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBCX: BALFX (250) vs WEBCX (1000). BALFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.77 vs. WEBCX (1.48). BALFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.52 vs. WEBCX (-1.12).
| BALFX | WEBCX | BALFX / WEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.39 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.39 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.603 | 4.202 | 205% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 252B | 33.5M | 752,239% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.21 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.77 | 1.48 | 726% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.13 | 5.29 | 589% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.52 | -1.12 | -3,272% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.68 | -7.90 | -819% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement