BALI vs CDNS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALI is a Buy and CDNS is a Hold.
CDNS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BALI | CDNS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 22% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
BALI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BALI has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BALI jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BALI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BALI | 100% | +0.51% | ||
| MSFT - BALI | 71% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| CDNS - BALI | 67% Closely correlated | -2.42% | ||
| AMZN - BALI | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| LRCX - BALI | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.91% | ||
| AVGO - BALI | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
More | ||||
CDNS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNS has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDNS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDNS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDNS | 100% | -2.42% | ||
| SNPS - CDNS | 87% Closely correlated | -3.13% | ||
| PDFS - CDNS | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| MSFT - CDNS | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| ADSK - CDNS | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| ANSS - CDNS | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
More | ||||