Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALPX vs CMRAX
BALPX vs CMRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALPX vs. CMRAX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALPX is a Hold and CMRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALPX has more cash in the bank: 4.86B vs. CMRAX (2.82M). BALPX pays higher dividends than CMRAX: BALPX (4.08) vs CMRAX (1.06). BALPX was incepted earlier than CMRAX: BALPX (18 years) vs CMRAX (2 years). CMRAX (12.56) is less costly to investors than BALPX (1.60). CMRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 136.00 vs. BALPX (81.00). BALPX initial investment is less costly to investors than CMRAX (3%) vs CMRAX (3%). BALPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMRAX: BALPX (1000) vs CMRAX (2500). CMRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.02 vs. BALPX (5.07).
| BALPX | CMRAX | BALPX / CMRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 2.16 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 12.56 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 2 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.999 | 8.621 | 70% |
| Front Load | 5% | 3% | 191% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.86B | 2.82M | 172,498% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.08 | 1.06 | 386% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.07 | 8.02 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.15 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.91 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.98 | -55.13 | -43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement