BAM
Price
$58.57
Change
-$1.73 (-2.87%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
16.34B
CG
Price
$49.86
Change
-$2.15 (-4.13%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
16.93B
68 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAM vs CG

Header iconBAM vs CG Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs CGBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$58.57
Change-$1.73 (-2.87%)
Volume$2.42M
Capitalization16.34B
Carlyle Group (The)
Price$49.86
Change-$2.15 (-4.13%)
Volume$2.85M
Capitalization16.93B
BAM vs CG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. CG commentary
Feb 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and CG is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 22, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $60.30 vs. CG: $52.01)
Brand notoriety: BAM and CG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 94% vs. CG: 126%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $16.34B vs. CG: $16.93B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.34B. CG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $16.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than CG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the short-term than CG.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.74% price change this week, while CG (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 08, 2023.

CG is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.70% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CG($16.9B) and BAM($16.3B) have the same market capitalization . CG has higher P/E ratio than BAM: CG (77.57) vs BAM (37.12). BAM YTD gains are higher at: 11.275 vs. CG (3.010). BAM has less debt than CG: BAM (256M) vs CG (9.26B). CG has higher revenues than BAM: CG (1.32B) vs BAM (383M).
BAMCGBAM / CG
Capitalization16.3B16.9B96%
EBITDA522MN/A-
Gain YTD11.2753.010375%
P/E Ratio37.1277.5748%
Revenue383M1.32B29%
Total Cash9MN/A-
Total Debt256M9.26B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs CG: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
CG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7568
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4642
SMR RATING
1..100
5234
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2999
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CG (80) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CG’s over the last 12 months.

CG's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (46) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

CG's SMR Rating (34) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (52) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CG (49) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CG (99) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew significantly faster than CG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMCG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DEI16.52-0.04
-0.24%
Douglas Emmett
G54.48-0.48
-0.87%
Genpact Limited
NAT2.62-0.03
-1.13%
Nordic American Tanker
VINC1.25-0.02
-1.57%
Vincerx Pharma Inc
CIA5.20-0.22
-4.06%
Citizens

CG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CG has been closely correlated with TPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CG jumps, then TPG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CG
1D Price
Change %
CG100%
-0.95%
TPG - CG
72%
Closely correlated
-2.95%
BX - CG
68%
Closely correlated
-1.77%
ARES - CG
67%
Closely correlated
-3.78%
JHG - CG
67%
Closely correlated
-1.95%
BAM - CG
66%
Closely correlated
-0.64%
More