BAM
Price
$44.23
Change
-$2.83 (-6.01%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
16.34B
CG
Price
$35.89
Change
-$2.82 (-7.28%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
16.93B
26 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAM vs CG

Header iconBAM vs CG Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs CGBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$44.23
Change-$2.83 (-6.01%)
Volume$2.75M
Capitalization16.34B
Carlyle Group (The)
Price$35.89
Change-$2.82 (-7.28%)
Volume$7.13M
Capitalization16.93B
BAM vs CG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. CG commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and CG is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $47.06 vs. CG: $38.71)
Brand notoriety: BAM and CG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 175% vs. CG: 204%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $16.34B vs. CG: $16.93B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.34B. CG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $16.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CG is a better buy in the long-term than BAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CG is a better buy in the short-term than BAM.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -6.65% price change this week, while CG (@Investment Managers) price change was -14.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 08, 2023.

CG is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-3.97% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CG($16.9B) and BAM($16.3B) have the same market capitalization . CG has higher P/E ratio than BAM: CG (77.57) vs BAM (37.12). BAM YTD gains are higher at: -12.476 vs. CG (-22.812). BAM has less debt than CG: BAM (256M) vs CG (9.26B). CG has higher revenues than BAM: CG (1.32B) vs BAM (383M).
BAMCGBAM / CG
Capitalization16.3B16.9B96%
EBITDA522MN/A-
Gain YTD-12.476-22.81255%
P/E Ratio37.1277.5748%
Revenue383M1.32B29%
Total Cash9MN/A-
Total Debt256M9.26B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs CG: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
CG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
315
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6549
SMR RATING
1..100
5225
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5458
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
37100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as CG (36) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

CG's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (65) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

CG's SMR Rating (25) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (52) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as CG (58) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CG (100) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMCG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESGRO20.220.07
+0.35%
Enstar Group Limited
ANIX2.60-0.16
-5.80%
Anixa Biosciences
SSD145.13-13.42
-8.46%
Simpson Manufacturing Co
AMSC16.67-2.27
-11.99%
American Superconductor Corp
HPK11.34-1.63
-12.57%
HighPeak Energy

CG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CG has been closely correlated with TPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CG jumps, then TPG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CG
1D Price
Change %
CG100%
-16.41%
TPG - CG
77%
Closely correlated
-14.69%
KKR - CG
77%
Closely correlated
-15.18%
BX - CG
77%
Closely correlated
-9.86%
APO - CG
75%
Closely correlated
-12.77%
ARES - CG
73%
Closely correlated
-15.48%
More