BAM
Price
$58.77
Change
+$0.38 (+0.65%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
94.21B
CG
Price
$59.10
Change
-$1.45 (-2.39%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
21.38B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs CG

Header iconBAM vs CG Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs CGBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$58.77
Change+$0.38 (+0.65%)
Volume$1.39M
Capitalization94.21B
Carlyle Group (The)
Price$59.10
Change-$1.45 (-2.39%)
Volume$2.88M
Capitalization21.38B
BAM vs CG Comparison Chart in %
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. CG commentary
Oct 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Buy and CG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 10, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $58.77 vs. CG: $59.10)
Brand notoriety: BAM and CG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 71% vs. CG: 95%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $94.21B vs. CG: $21.38B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $94.21B. CG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $21.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $180.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CG is a better buy in the long-term than BAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the short-term than CG.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.49% price change this week, while CG (@Investment Managers) price change was -4.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

CG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.46% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($94.2B) has a higher market cap than CG($21.4B). BAM has higher P/E ratio than CG: BAM (41.10) vs CG (17.28). CG YTD gains are higher at: 19.376 vs. BAM (10.966). BAM has less debt than CG: BAM (1.25B) vs CG (10.7B). CG has higher revenues than BAM: CG (3.71B) vs BAM (835M).
BAMCGBAM / CG
Capitalization94.2B21.4B440%
EBITDA970MN/A-
Gain YTD10.96619.37657%
P/E Ratio41.1017.28238%
Revenue835M3.71B23%
Total Cash480MN/A-
Total Debt1.25B10.7B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs CG: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
CG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1960
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5037
SMR RATING
1..100
5730
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4845
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
70100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as CG (26) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

CG's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (50) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

CG's SMR Rating (30) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (57) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

CG's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (48) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as CG (100) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMCG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RIGS23.200.03
+0.13%
RiverFront Strategic Income ETF
ITM46.61-0.02
-0.05%
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF
FEBP31.03-0.04
-0.14%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Feb
EFR11.44-0.05
-0.44%
Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Fund
CTBB19.16-0.31
-1.59%
Qwest Corp

CG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CG has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CG jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CG
1D Price
Change %
CG100%
-2.39%
KKR - CG
88%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
TPG - CG
87%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
ARES - CG
84%
Closely correlated
-1.70%
OWL - CG
84%
Closely correlated
-1.57%
STEP - CG
84%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
More