BAM
Price
$55.39
Change
-$2.47 (-4.27%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:07 PM (EDT)
CG
Price
$50.11
Change
-$1.67 (-3.23%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:09 PM (EDT)
49 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAM vs CG

Header iconBAM vs CG Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs CGBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$55.39
Change-$2.47 (-4.27%)
Volume$953
CapitalizationN/A
Carlyle Group (The)
Price$50.11
Change-$1.67 (-3.23%)
Volume$1.44K
CapitalizationN/A
BAM vs CG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. CG commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and CG is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BAM: $57.86 vs. CG: $51.78)
Brand notoriety: BAM and CG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 61% vs. CG: 105%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $16.34B vs. CG: $16.93B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.34B. CG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $16.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than CG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BAM and CG are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.07% price change this week, while CG (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 08, 2023.

CG is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.24% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CG($16.9B) and BAM($16.3B) have the same market capitalization . CG has higher P/E ratio than BAM: CG (77.57) vs BAM (37.12). BAM YTD gains are higher at: 49.161 vs. CG (31.323). BAM has less debt than CG: BAM (256M) vs CG (9.26B). CG has higher revenues than BAM: CG (1.32B) vs BAM (383M).
BAMCGBAM / CG
Capitalization16.3B16.9B96%
EBITDA522MN/A-
Gain YTD49.16131.323157%
P/E Ratio37.1277.5748%
Revenue383M1.32B29%
Total Cash9MN/A-
Total Debt256M9.26B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs CG: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
CG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6873
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4537
SMR RATING
1..100
5232
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3841
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
186
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CG (83) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CG’s over the last 12 months.

CG's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (45) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

CG's SMR Rating (32) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (52) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CG (41) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

CG's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (18) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMCG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTPI0.500.23
+87.27%
Petros Pharmaceuticals
AENT6.250.42
+7.20%
Alliance Entertainment Holding Corp
ESTC107.252.64
+2.52%
Elastic NV
PSEC4.37-0.01
-0.23%
Prospect Capital Corp
EB3.61-0.04
-1.10%
Eventbrite

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
-1.50%
BN - BAM
78%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
BX - BAM
69%
Closely correlated
-2.84%
CG - BAM
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.86%
APAM - BAM
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.40%
JHG - BAM
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.61%
More

CG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CG has been closely correlated with TPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CG jumps, then TPG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CG
1D Price
Change %
CG100%
-1.86%
TPG - CG
69%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
BX - CG
68%
Closely correlated
-2.84%
JHG - CG
66%
Closely correlated
-1.61%
APAM - CG
65%
Loosely correlated
-3.40%
KKR - CG
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.13%
More