BAM
Price
$55.57
Change
+$0.53 (+0.96%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
16.34B
IGIFF
Price
$31.32
Change
+$0.22 (+0.71%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
7.38B
Ad is loading...

BAM vs IGIFF

Header iconBAM vs IGIFF Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs IGIFFBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$55.57
Change+$0.53 (+0.96%)
Volume$550.38K
Capitalization16.34B
IGM Financial
Price$31.32
Change+$0.22 (+0.71%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization7.38B
BAM vs IGIFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IGIFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. IGIFF commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and IGIFF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $55.57 vs. IGIFF: $31.32)
Brand notoriety: BAM and IGIFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 61% vs. IGIFF: 10%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $16.34B vs. IGIFF: $7.38B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.34B. IGIFF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $7.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIGIFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IGIFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than IGIFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IGIFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • IGIFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the short-term than IGIFF.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +6.72% price change this week, while IGIFF (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 08, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.49% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($16.3B) has a higher market cap than IGIFF($7.38B). BAM has higher P/E ratio than IGIFF: BAM (37.12) vs IGIFF (9.53). BAM YTD gains are higher at: 2.547 vs. IGIFF (-2.003). IGIFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.51B vs. BAM (522M). IGIFF has more cash in the bank: 1.12B vs. BAM (9M). BAM has less debt than IGIFF: BAM (256M) vs IGIFF (6.85B). IGIFF has higher revenues than BAM: IGIFF (3.42B) vs BAM (383M).
BAMIGIFFBAM / IGIFF
Capitalization16.3B7.38B221%
EBITDA522M1.51B35%
Gain YTD2.547-2.003-127%
P/E Ratio37.129.53389%
Revenue383M3.42B11%
Total Cash9M1.12B1%
Total Debt256M6.85B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs IGIFF: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
IGIFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4779
SMR RATING
1..100
5254
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4149
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2021
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IGIFF (96). This means that BAM’s stock grew significantly faster than IGIFF’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as IGIFF (79). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to IGIFF’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as IGIFF (54). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to IGIFF’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as IGIFF (49). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to IGIFF’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as IGIFF (21). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to IGIFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMIGIFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
77%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
72%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IGIFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TCRT1.800.07
+4.05%
Alaunos Therapeutics Inc.
QGEN46.000.10
+0.22%
Qiagen NV
BYND4.08-0.10
-2.39%
Beyond Meat
BBAR21.89-0.83
-3.65%
Banco BBVA Argentina SA
GMGI2.04-0.15
-6.85%
Golden Matrix Group

IGIFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IGIFF has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IGIFF jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IGIFF
1D Price
Change %
IGIFF100%
+0.71%
APAM - IGIFF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
BN - IGIFF
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
BLK - IGIFF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
BAM - IGIFF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
NTRS - IGIFF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
More