BAM
Price
$58.09
Change
+$0.08 (+0.14%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
93.65B
IGIFF
Price
$36.09
Change
-$0.32 (-0.88%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
8.48B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs IGIFF

Header iconBAM vs IGIFF Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs IGIFFBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$58.09
Change+$0.08 (+0.14%)
Volume$1.73M
Capitalization93.65B
IGM Financial
Price$36.09
Change-$0.32 (-0.88%)
Volume$1.83K
Capitalization8.48B
BAM vs IGIFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IGIFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. IGIFF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Buy and IGIFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $58.09 vs. IGIFF: $36.09)
Brand notoriety: BAM and IGIFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 90% vs. IGIFF: 19%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $93.65B vs. IGIFF: $8.48B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $93.65B. IGIFF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIGIFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IGIFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IGIFF is a better buy in the long-term than BAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IGIFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • IGIFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the short-term than IGIFF.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.22% price change this week, while IGIFF (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.00% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($93.6B) has a higher market cap than IGIFF($8.48B). BAM has higher P/E ratio than IGIFF: BAM (40.62) vs IGIFF (12.23). IGIFF YTD gains are higher at: 12.922 vs. BAM (9.682). IGIFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.39B vs. BAM (970M). IGIFF has more cash in the bank: 2.44B vs. BAM (480M). BAM has less debt than IGIFF: BAM (1.25B) vs IGIFF (7.52B). IGIFF has higher revenues than BAM: IGIFF (3.63B) vs BAM (835M).
BAMIGIFFBAM / IGIFF
Capitalization93.6B8.48B1,103%
EBITDA970M1.39B70%
Gain YTD9.68212.92275%
P/E Ratio40.6212.23332%
Revenue835M3.63B23%
Total Cash480M2.44B20%
Total Debt1.25B7.52B17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs IGIFF: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
IGIFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5260
SMR RATING
1..100
5761
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5339
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a6

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as IGIFF (23). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to IGIFF’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as IGIFF (60). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to IGIFF’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as IGIFF (61). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to IGIFF’s over the last 12 months.

IGIFF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as BAM (50). This means that IGIFF’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

IGIFF's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as BAM (53). This means that IGIFF’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMIGIFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IGIFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
METV20.430.15
+0.74%
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF
HYDB47.820.08
+0.17%
iShares High Yield Systematic Bond ETF
TXUG25.67N/A
N/A
Thornburg International Growth ETF
EOCT30.61-0.01
-0.03%
Innovator Emerg Mkts Pwr Bffr ETF™-Oct
BTRN37.17-1.10
-2.86%
Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF

IGIFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IGIFF has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IGIFF jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IGIFF
1D Price
Change %
IGIFF100%
-0.88%
APAM - IGIFF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
BN - IGIFF
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
BLK - IGIFF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
BAM - IGIFF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
NTRS - IGIFF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.47%
More