BAM
Price
$48.59
Change
+$0.60 (+1.25%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
16.34B
JHG
Price
$30.72
Change
+$0.17 (+0.56%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
5.22B
13 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAM vs JHG

Header iconBAM vs JHG Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs JHGBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$48.59
Change+$0.60 (+1.25%)
Volume$1.22M
Capitalization16.34B
Janus Henderson Group
Price$30.72
Change+$0.17 (+0.56%)
Volume$1.09M
Capitalization5.22B
BAM vs JHG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. JHG commentary
Apr 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and JHG is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $48.59 vs. JHG: $30.72)
Brand notoriety: BAM and JHG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 55% vs. JHG: 73%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $16.34B vs. JHG: $5.22B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.34B. JHG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJHG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JHG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than JHG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JHG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • JHG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the short-term than JHG.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +5.45% price change this week, while JHG (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 08, 2023.

JHG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.92% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($16.3B) has a higher market cap than JHG($5.22B). BAM has higher P/E ratio than JHG: BAM (37.12) vs JHG (13.66). BAM YTD gains are higher at: -9.631 vs. JHG (-27.135). JHG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 563M vs. BAM (522M). JHG has more cash in the bank: 1.89B vs. BAM (9M). BAM has less debt than JHG: BAM (256M) vs JHG (382M). JHG has higher revenues than BAM: JHG (2.1B) vs BAM (383M).
BAMJHGBAM / JHG
Capitalization16.3B5.22B312%
EBITDA522M563M93%
Gain YTD-9.631-27.13535%
P/E Ratio37.1213.66272%
Revenue383M2.1B18%
Total Cash9M1.89B0%
Total Debt256M382M67%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs JHG: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
JHG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
912
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4642
SMR RATING
1..100
5273
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5264
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3553
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as JHG (30) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to JHG’s over the last 12 months.

JHG's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (46) in the null industry. This means that JHG’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as JHG (73) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to JHG’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as JHG (64) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to JHG’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as JHG (53) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to JHG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMJHG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JPC7.360.06
+0.82%
Nuveen Preferred & Income Opportunities Fund
BMAR43.540.13
+0.29%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - Mar
UPAR13.010.02
+0.12%
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF
IBMP25.100.01
+0.04%
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bd ETF
IDAT28.55N/A
N/A
iShares Future Cloud 5G and Tech ETF

JHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JHG has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JHG jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JHG
1D Price
Change %
JHG100%
+0.56%
KKR - JHG
82%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
IVZ - JHG
81%
Closely correlated
+1.27%
BN - JHG
80%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
CG - JHG
79%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
BX - JHG
78%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
More