BAM
Price
$54.19
Change
+$0.39 (+0.72%)
Updated
Dec 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
LBGUF
Price
$53.11
Change
+$2.35 (+4.63%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Ad is loading...

BAM vs LBGUF

Header iconBAM vs LBGUF Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs LBGUFBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$54.19
Change+$0.39 (+0.72%)
Volume$6.13K
CapitalizationN/A
LE Lundbergfoeretagen AB
Price$53.11
Change+$2.35 (+4.63%)
Volume$352
CapitalizationN/A
BAM vs LBGUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. LBGUF commentary
Dec 20, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and LBGUF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 20, 2024
Stock price -- (BAM: $53.80 vs. LBGUF: $53.11)
Brand notoriety: BAM and LBGUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 132% vs. LBGUF: 98%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $16.34B vs. LBGUF: $10.92B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.34B. LBGUF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $10.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLBGUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LBGUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than LBGUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BAM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -8.92% price change this week, while LBGUF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 08, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.60% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($16.3B) has a higher market cap than LBGUF($10.9B). BAM has higher P/E ratio than LBGUF: BAM (37.12) vs LBGUF (16.81). BAM YTD gains are higher at: 38.694 vs. LBGUF (10.636). LBGUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.5B vs. BAM (522M). LBGUF has more cash in the bank: 2.79B vs. BAM (9M). BAM has less debt than LBGUF: BAM (256M) vs LBGUF (20.8B). LBGUF has higher revenues than BAM: LBGUF (32.6B) vs BAM (383M).
BAMLBGUFBAM / LBGUF
Capitalization16.3B10.9B150%
EBITDA522M13.5B4%
Gain YTD38.69410.636364%
P/E Ratio37.1216.81221%
Revenue383M32.6B1%
Total Cash9M2.79B0%
Total Debt256M20.8B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs LBGUF: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
LBGUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6847
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50100
SMR RATING
1..100
5298
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3952
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2176
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as LBGUF (35). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to LBGUF’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LBGUF (100). This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than LBGUF’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LBGUF (98). This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than LBGUF’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as LBGUF (52). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to LBGUF’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LBGUF (76). This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than LBGUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMLBGUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XXII5.350.98
+22.43%
22nd Century Group Inc
DLNG4.36-0.04
-0.91%
Dynagas LNG Parners LP
SD10.52-0.45
-4.10%
SandRidge Energy
MTSI132.49-5.69
-4.12%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings
DEI18.66-1.66
-8.17%
Douglas Emmett

LBGUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBGUF has been loosely correlated with GMPXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LBGUF jumps, then GMPXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBGUF
1D Price
Change %
LBGUF100%
N/A
GMPXF - LBGUF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KKR - LBGUF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.47%
BAM - LBGUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-7.02%
JBARF - LBGUF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.66%
JBAXY - LBGUF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.23%
More