BAM
Price
$58.27
Change
-$0.74 (-1.25%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
94.32B
LGGNY
Price
$15.85
Change
+$0.07 (+0.44%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
17.8B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs LGGNY

Header iconBAM vs LGGNY Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs LGGNYBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$58.27
Change-$0.74 (-1.25%)
Volume$3.91M
Capitalization94.32B
Legal & General Group
Price$15.85
Change+$0.07 (+0.44%)
Volume$34.06K
Capitalization17.8B
BAM vs LGGNY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGGNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. LGGNY commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and LGGNY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $58.27 vs. LGGNY: $15.85)
Brand notoriety: BAM and LGGNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 211% vs. LGGNY: 90%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $94.32B vs. LGGNY: $17.8B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $94.32B. LGGNY’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $17.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLGGNY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LGGNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than LGGNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LGGNY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LGGNY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BAM and LGGNY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.14% price change this week, while LGGNY (@Investment Managers) price change was -5.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($94.3B) has a higher market cap than LGGNY($17.8B). LGGNY has higher P/E ratio than BAM: LGGNY (53.95) vs BAM (41.27). LGGNY YTD gains are higher at: 19.031 vs. BAM (10.022). LGGNY has higher revenues than BAM: LGGNY (18.6B) vs BAM (835M).
BAMLGGNYBAM / LGGNY
Capitalization94.3B17.8B530%
EBITDA970MN/A-
Gain YTD10.02219.03153%
P/E Ratio41.2753.9576%
Revenue835M18.6B4%
Total Cash12MN/A-
Total Debt639MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs LGGNY: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
LGGNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6152
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5152
SMR RATING
1..100
5696
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4860
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3634
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LGGNY's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as BAM (21). This means that LGGNY’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as LGGNY (52). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to LGGNY’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGGNY (96). This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGGNY’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as LGGNY (60). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to LGGNY’s over the last 12 months.

LGGNY's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as BAM (36). This means that LGGNY’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMLGGNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGGNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCSE14.130.17
+1.18%
Franklin Sustainable Intl Eq ETF
JHEM30.260.29
+0.98%
JHancock Multifactor Em Mkts ETF
ETHO63.390.24
+0.38%
Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF
VDC220.350.66
+0.30%
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
BRIF28.590.08
+0.27%
FIS Bright Portfolios Focused Equity ETF

LGGNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGGNY has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LGGNY jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGGNY
1D Price
Change %
LGGNY100%
+0.44%
APAM - LGGNY
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
BN - LGGNY
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
JHG - LGGNY
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
BAM - LGGNY
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
PAX - LGGNY
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More