BAM
Price
$50.65
Change
+$0.77 (+1.54%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
81.97B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LIEN
Price
$10.51
Change
-$0.03 (-0.28%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
241.21M
132 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs LIEN

Header iconBAM vs LIEN Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs LIENBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$50.65
Change+$0.77 (+1.54%)
Volume$35.45K
Capitalization81.97B
Chicago Atlantic BDC
Price$10.51
Change-$0.03 (-0.28%)
Volume$779
Capitalization241.21M
BAM vs LIEN Comparison Chart in %
BAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LIEN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. LIEN commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and LIEN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $50.65 vs. LIEN: $10.57)
Brand notoriety: BAM and LIEN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 148% vs. LIEN: 173%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $81.97B vs. LIEN: $241.21M
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $81.97B. LIEN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $241.21M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $157.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLIEN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LIEN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LIEN is a better buy in the long-term than BAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIEN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LIEN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LIEN is a better buy in the short-term than BAM.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -7.37% price change this week, while LIEN (@Investment Managers) price change was +5.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

LIEN is expected to report earnings on Apr 01, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.61% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($82B) has a higher market cap than LIEN($241M). BAM has higher P/E ratio than LIEN: BAM (32.18) vs LIEN (6.01). BAM YTD gains are higher at: -4.366 vs. LIEN (-4.692). BAM has more cash in the bank: 480M vs. LIEN (5.4K). LIEN has less debt than BAM: LIEN (5M) vs BAM (1.25B). BAM has higher revenues than LIEN: BAM (835M) vs LIEN (31.4M).
BAMLIENBAM / LIEN
Capitalization82B241M34,025%
EBITDA970MN/A-
Gain YTD-4.366-4.69293%
P/E Ratio32.186.01536%
Revenue835M31.4M2,659%
Total Cash480M5.4K8,888,889%
Total Debt1.25B5M25,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
70
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63
SMR RATING
1..100
56
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
86
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMLIEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LIEN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLN17.62-0.01
-0.03%
VanEck Long Muni ETF
UFIV49.38-0.02
-0.04%
F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF
MDST26.19-0.02
-0.08%
Westwood Salient Enhanced Mid Inc ETF
NOBL101.65-0.61
-0.60%
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats
CORX10.77-0.33
-3.02%
2x Corn ETF

LIEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIEN has been loosely correlated with TXMD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIEN jumps, then TXMD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIEN
1D Price
Change %
LIEN100%
+0.28%
TXMD - LIEN
36%
Loosely correlated
+6.49%
AVDL - LIEN
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
SHPH - LIEN
21%
Poorly correlated
-7.58%
BAM - LIEN
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
AKAN - LIEN
9%
Poorly correlated
-10.79%
More