BAM
Price
$60.16
Change
-$0.59 (-0.97%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
97.79B
LIEN
Price
$11.01
Change
+$0.11 (+1.01%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
251.25M
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs LIEN

Header iconBAM vs LIEN Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs LIENBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$60.16
Change-$0.59 (-0.97%)
Volume$1.75M
Capitalization97.79B
Chicago Atlantic BDC
Price$11.01
Change+$0.11 (+1.01%)
Volume$96.48K
Capitalization251.25M
BAM vs LIEN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. LIEN commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a StrongBuy and LIEN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $60.16 vs. LIEN: $11.01)
Brand notoriety: BAM and LIEN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 78% vs. LIEN: 298%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $97.79B vs. LIEN: $251.25M
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $97.79B. LIEN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $251.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $174.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLIEN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LIEN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than LIEN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIEN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LIEN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the short-term than LIEN.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.76% price change this week, while LIEN (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

LIEN is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.19% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($97.8B) has a higher market cap than LIEN($251M). BAM has higher P/E ratio than LIEN: BAM (42.07) vs LIEN (8.16). BAM YTD gains are higher at: 13.591 vs. LIEN (-3.775). BAM has more cash in the bank: 12M vs. LIEN (5.4K). LIEN has less debt than BAM: LIEN (5M) vs BAM (639M). BAM has higher revenues than LIEN: BAM (835M) vs LIEN (31.4M).
BAMLIENBAM / LIEN
Capitalization97.8B251M38,964%
EBITDA970MN/A-
Gain YTD13.591-3.775-360%
P/E Ratio42.078.16516%
Revenue835M31.4M2,659%
Total Cash12M5.4K222,222%
Total Debt639M5M12,780%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48
SMR RATING
1..100
56
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMLIEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSHI49.720.01
+0.02%
NEOS Enhanced Income CA Alt ETF
FTKI18.92N/A
N/A
First Trust Small Cap Buywrite Income ETF
DVLU31.18-0.02
-0.06%
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momt & Val ETF
SCHI22.88-0.04
-0.17%
Schwab 5-10 Year Corp Bd ETF
OCIO36.34-0.20
-0.54%
ClearShares OCIO ETF

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
-0.25%
BN - BAM
84%
Closely correlated
-0.08%
BX - BAM
78%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
KKR - BAM
77%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
CG - BAM
75%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
STEP - BAM
74%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
More

LIEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIEN has been loosely correlated with TXMD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIEN jumps, then TXMD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIEN
1D Price
Change %
LIEN100%
+1.01%
TXMD - LIEN
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
AVDL - LIEN
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
SHPH - LIEN
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
OXLCP - LIEN
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
BAM - LIEN
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
More