BAM
Price
$44.18
Change
-$2.88 (-6.12%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.34B
ONEXF
Price
$67.90
Change
-$0.66 (-0.96%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.95B
34 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAM vs ONEXF

Header iconBAM vs ONEXF Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs ONEXFBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$44.18
Change-$2.88 (-6.12%)
Volume$17.25K
Capitalization16.34B
Onex
Price$67.90
Change-$0.66 (-0.96%)
Volume$17.44K
Capitalization4.95B
BAM vs ONEXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. ONEXF commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and ONEXF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $47.06 vs. ONEXF: $67.90)
Brand notoriety: BAM and ONEXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 175% vs. ONEXF: 31%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $16.34B vs. ONEXF: $4.95B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.34B. ONEXF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileONEXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ONEXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than ONEXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -6.65% price change this week, while ONEXF (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 08, 2023.

ONEXF is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-3.97% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($16.3B) has a higher market cap than ONEXF($4.95B). BAM has higher P/E ratio than ONEXF: BAM (37.12) vs ONEXF (15.92). BAM YTD gains are higher at: -12.476 vs. ONEXF (-13.657). BAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 522M vs. ONEXF (99M). ONEXF has more cash in the bank: 84M vs. BAM (9M). BAM has less debt than ONEXF: BAM (256M) vs ONEXF (3.63B). BAM has higher revenues than ONEXF: BAM (383M) vs ONEXF (340M).
BAMONEXFBAM / ONEXF
Capitalization16.3B4.95B329%
EBITDA522M99M527%
Gain YTD-12.476-13.65791%
P/E Ratio37.1215.92233%
Revenue383M340M113%
Total Cash9M84M11%
Total Debt256M3.63B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs ONEXF: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
ONEXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
33
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6556
SMR RATING
1..100
5285
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5473
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3712
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as ONEXF (39). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to ONEXF’s over the last 12 months.

ONEXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as BAM (65). This means that ONEXF’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ONEXF (85). This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than ONEXF’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as ONEXF (73). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to ONEXF’s over the last 12 months.

ONEXF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as BAM (37). This means that ONEXF’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESGRO20.220.07
+0.35%
Enstar Group Limited
ANIX2.60-0.16
-5.80%
Anixa Biosciences
SSD145.13-13.42
-8.46%
Simpson Manufacturing Co
AMSC16.67-2.27
-11.99%
American Superconductor Corp
HPK11.34-1.63
-12.57%
HighPeak Energy

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
-7.38%
BN - BAM
84%
Closely correlated
-7.41%
BX - BAM
77%
Closely correlated
-9.86%
CG - BAM
73%
Closely correlated
-16.41%
KKR - BAM
69%
Closely correlated
-15.18%
ARES - BAM
69%
Closely correlated
-15.48%
More

ONEXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ONEXF and CIXXF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ONEXF and CIXXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONEXF
1D Price
Change %
ONEXF100%
-0.96%
CIXXF - ONEXF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
BLK - ONEXF
28%
Poorly correlated
-7.71%
JHG - ONEXF
27%
Poorly correlated
-11.05%
BN - ONEXF
26%
Poorly correlated
-7.41%
BAM - ONEXF
26%
Poorly correlated
-7.38%
More