BAM
Price
$50.65
Change
+$0.77 (+1.54%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
81.97B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ONEXF
Price
$74.28
Change
-$0.96 (-1.28%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
5.16B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs ONEXF

Header iconBAM vs ONEXF Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs ONEXFBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$50.65
Change+$0.77 (+1.54%)
Volume$3.33M
Capitalization81.97B
Onex
Price$74.28
Change-$0.96 (-1.28%)
Volume$2.07K
Capitalization5.16B
BAM vs ONEXF Comparison Chart in %
BAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ONEXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. ONEXF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and ONEXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $50.65 vs. ONEXF: $74.79)
Brand notoriety: BAM and ONEXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 148% vs. ONEXF: 68%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $81.97B vs. ONEXF: $5.16B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $81.97B. ONEXF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $157.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileONEXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ONEXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ONEXF is a better buy in the long-term than BAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ONEXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ONEXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the short-term than ONEXF.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -7.37% price change this week, while ONEXF (@Investment Managers) price change was -6.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.61% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($82B) has a higher market cap than ONEXF($5.16B). BAM has higher P/E ratio than ONEXF: BAM (32.18) vs ONEXF (11.95). BAM YTD gains are higher at: -4.366 vs. ONEXF (-4.896). BAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 970M vs. ONEXF (539M). ONEXF has more cash in the bank: 636M vs. BAM (480M). BAM has less debt than ONEXF: BAM (1.25B) vs ONEXF (4.75B). ONEXF (841M) and BAM (835M) have equivalent revenues.
BAMONEXFBAM / ONEXF
Capitalization82B5.16B1,589%
EBITDA970M539M180%
Gain YTD-4.366-4.89689%
P/E Ratio32.1811.95269%
Revenue835M841M99%
Total Cash480M636M75%
Total Debt1.25B4.75B26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs ONEXF: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
ONEXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7382
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6150
SMR RATING
1..100
5678
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7762
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8618
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6547

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as ONEXF (33). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to ONEXF’s over the last 12 months.

ONEXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as BAM (61). This means that ONEXF’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as ONEXF (78). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to ONEXF’s over the last 12 months.

ONEXF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as BAM (77). This means that ONEXF’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

ONEXF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BAM (86). This means that ONEXF’s stock grew significantly faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMONEXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ONEXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLN17.62-0.01
-0.03%
VanEck Long Muni ETF
UFIV49.38-0.02
-0.04%
F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF
MDST26.19-0.02
-0.08%
Westwood Salient Enhanced Mid Inc ETF
NOBL101.65-0.61
-0.60%
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats
CORX10.77-0.33
-3.02%
2x Corn ETF

ONEXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ONEXF and BLK have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ONEXF and BLK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONEXF
1D Price
Change %
ONEXF100%
+0.69%
BLK - ONEXF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
JHG - ONEXF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
BN - ONEXF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
TPG - ONEXF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
BAM - ONEXF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
More