BAM
Price
$54.60
Change
-$1.54 (-2.74%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
16.34B
TGOPY
Price
$28.35
Change
-$0.62 (-2.14%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
24.73B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs TGOPY

Header iconBAM vs TGOPY Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs TGOPYBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$54.60
Change-$1.54 (-2.74%)
Volume$1.24M
Capitalization16.34B
3i Group
Price$28.35
Change-$0.62 (-2.14%)
Volume$96.5K
Capitalization24.73B
BAM vs TGOPY Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGOPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. TGOPY commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and TGOPY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $54.60 vs. TGOPY: $28.35)
Brand notoriety: BAM and TGOPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 55% vs. TGOPY: 56%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $16.34B vs. TGOPY: $24.73B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.34B. TGOPY’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $24.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTGOPY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TGOPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BAM and TGOPY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGOPY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TGOPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the short-term than TGOPY.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -5.09% price change this week, while TGOPY (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAM is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2025.

TGOPY is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.10% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TGOPY($24.7B) has a higher market cap than BAM($16.3B). BAM has higher P/E ratio than TGOPY: BAM (37.12) vs TGOPY (4.16). TGOPY YTD gains are higher at: 25.442 vs. BAM (2.350). BAM has less debt than TGOPY: BAM (256M) vs TGOPY (785M). TGOPY has higher revenues than BAM: TGOPY (4.71B) vs BAM (383M).
BAMTGOPYBAM / TGOPY
Capitalization16.3B24.7B66%
EBITDA522MN/A-
Gain YTD2.35025.4429%
P/E Ratio37.124.16893%
Revenue383M4.71B8%
Total Cash9MN/A-
Total Debt256M785M33%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs TGOPY: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
TGOPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
482
SMR RATING
1..100
5956
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4843
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3649
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as TGOPY (41). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to TGOPY’s over the last 12 months.

TGOPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAM (48). This means that TGOPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.

TGOPY's SMR Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as BAM (59). This means that TGOPY’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

TGOPY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as BAM (48). This means that TGOPY’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as TGOPY (49). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to TGOPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMTGOPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGOPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLIAX10.32-0.04
-0.39%
First Sentier American Listed Infras Ins
HQITX21.10-0.16
-0.75%
Hartford Equity Income R5
PJECX14.93-0.12
-0.80%
PGIM US Real Estate C
DRTHX19.22-0.25
-1.28%
BNY Mellon Sustainable US Eq Fd Z
GSCGX32.89-0.43
-1.29%
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity A

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
-2.74%
BN - BAM
85%
Closely correlated
-2.30%
BX - BAM
78%
Closely correlated
-3.11%
CG - BAM
75%
Closely correlated
-3.21%
KKR - BAM
74%
Closely correlated
-3.12%
ARES - BAM
73%
Closely correlated
-2.49%
More

TGOPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGOPY has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TGOPY jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGOPY
1D Price
Change %
TGOPY100%
-2.14%
BN - TGOPY
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
BAM - TGOPY
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.74%
TPG - TGOPY
43%
Loosely correlated
-3.82%
HLNE - TGOPY
42%
Loosely correlated
-5.15%
AAMI - TGOPY
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.80%
More