BAM
Price
$46.89
Change
-$1.72 (-3.54%)
Updated
Mar 10 closing price
Capitalization
16.34B
TPG
Price
$46.50
Change
-$2.58 (-5.26%)
Updated
Mar 10 closing price
Capitalization
4.5B
57 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAM vs TPG

Header iconBAM vs TPG Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs TPGBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$46.89
Change-$1.72 (-3.54%)
Volume$2.95M
Capitalization16.34B
TPG
Price$46.50
Change-$2.58 (-5.26%)
Volume$2.1M
Capitalization4.5B
BAM vs TPG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TPG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. TPG commentary
Mar 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a StrongBuy and TPG is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 11, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $46.89 vs. TPG: $46.50)
Brand notoriety: BAM and TPG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 165% vs. TPG: 180%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $16.34B vs. TPG: $4.5B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.34B. TPG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTPG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TPG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than TPG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TPG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TPG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the short-term than TPG.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -15.45% price change this week, while TPG (@Investment Managers) price change was -11.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 08, 2023.

TPG is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-3.28% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($16.3B) has a higher market cap than TPG($4.5B). TPG has higher P/E ratio than BAM: TPG (434.29) vs BAM (37.12). BAM YTD gains are higher at: -12.792 vs. TPG (-25.326). BAM has less debt than TPG: BAM (256M) vs TPG (1.26B). TPG has higher revenues than BAM: TPG (2.41B) vs BAM (383M).
BAMTPGBAM / TPG
Capitalization16.3B4.5B362%
EBITDA522MN/A-
Gain YTD-12.792-25.32651%
P/E Ratio37.12434.299%
Revenue383M2.41B16%
Total Cash9MN/A-
Total Debt256M1.26B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
58
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73
SMR RATING
1..100
50
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
70
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMTPG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TPG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IVEG20.65-0.37
-1.75%
iShares Emergent Food and AgTch Mult ETF
LGH48.75-1.20
-2.40%
HCM Defender 500 Index ETF
PPI14.01-0.47
-3.26%
AXS Astoria Real Assets ETF
FDIS84.75-3.32
-3.77%
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discret ETF
FDTX31.63-1.66
-4.99%
Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
-3.54%
BN - BAM
81%
Closely correlated
-3.34%
BX - BAM
73%
Closely correlated
-3.98%
CG - BAM
70%
Closely correlated
-6.91%
JHG - BAM
66%
Closely correlated
-2.87%
ARES - BAM
65%
Loosely correlated
-8.85%
More