Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMA vs CGBL
BAMA vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts BAMA vs CGBL
Brookstone Active ETF
Price$31.25
Change+$0.25 (+0.81%)
Volume$2.19K
Net Assets41.9M
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$33.02
Change+$0.22 (+0.67%)
Volume$1.13K
Net Assets2.36B
BAMA vs CGBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMA vs. CGBL commentary
Jun 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMA is a Buy and CGBL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 2.36B vs. BAMA (41.9M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMA: CGBL (5.280) vs BAMA (2.433). BAMA was incepted earlier than CGBL: BAMA (2 years) vs CGBL (2 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than BAMA (0.99). CGBL has a higher turnover BAMA (0.00) vs BAMA (0.00).
| BAMA | CGBL | BAMA / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 2.433 | 5.280 | 46% |
| Net Assets | 41.9M | 2.36B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.33 | 300% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 24.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.42 | 1.92 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMA | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 84% | 13 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 58% | 5 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OAKGX | 35.09 | 0.02 | +0.06% |
| Oakmark Global Investor | |||
| DVLCX | 22.46 | N/A | N/A |
| BNY Mellon Opportunistic Midcap Value C | |||
| HJIGX | 14.51 | N/A | N/A |
| Hardman Johnston Intl Gr Fd Instl Shr | |||
| MISAX | 17.93 | N/A | N/A |
| Victory Trivalent International Sm-Cp A | |||
| RIRCX | 74.82 | N/A | N/A |
| American Funds Capital Income Bldr R3 | |||
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.68% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| IR - CGBL | 75% Closely correlated | +1.92% | ||
More | ||||