Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMA vs CGBL
BAMA vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts BAMA vs CGBL
Brookstone Active ETF
Price$33.76
Change+$0.12 (+0.36%)
Volume$575
Net Assets46.58M
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$34.99
Change+$0.12 (+0.34%)
Volume$1.48K
Net Assets3.6B
BAMA vs CGBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMA vs. CGBL commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMA is a Buy and CGBL is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.6B vs. BAMA (46.6M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMA: CGBL (13.114) vs BAMA (10.702). BAMA was incepted earlier than CGBL: BAMA (2 years) vs CGBL (2 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than BAMA (0.99). CGBL has a higher turnover BAMA (0.00) vs BAMA (0.00).
| BAMA | CGBL | BAMA / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 10.702 | 13.114 | 82% |
| Net Assets | 46.6M | 3.6B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.33 | 300% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 24.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.33 | 1.96 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMA | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 36% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 55% | 14 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PBP | 22.25 | 0.03 | +0.14% |
| Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | |||
| ADVE | 39.40 | N/A | N/A |
| Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF | |||
| GSEW | 85.30 | -0.42 | -0.49% |
| Goldman Sachs Equal Wght US Lg Cp Eq ETF | |||
| TBF | 23.73 | -0.13 | -0.54% |
| ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury | |||
| DTAN | 30.51 | -0.30 | -0.97% |
| Sparkline International IntangibleValETF | |||
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 75% Closely correlated | -2.48% | ||
More | ||||