Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMA vs CGBL
BAMA vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts BAMA vs CGBL
Brookstone Active ETF
Price$33.46
Change+$0.07 (+0.21%)
Volume$338
Net Assets45.31M
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$34.31
Change+$0.06 (+0.18%)
Volume$1.53K
Net Assets3.86B
BAMA vs CGBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMA vs. CGBL commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMA is a Hold and CGBL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.86B vs. BAMA (45.3M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMA: CGBL (11.102) vs BAMA (9.880). BAMA was incepted earlier than CGBL: BAMA (2 years) vs CGBL (2 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than BAMA (0.99). CGBL has a higher turnover BAMA (0.00) vs BAMA (0.00).
| BAMA | CGBL | BAMA / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 9.880 | 11.102 | 89% |
| Net Assets | 45.3M | 3.86B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.33 | 300% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 24.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.31 | 1.95 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMA | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 87% | 8 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.32% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
More | ||||