Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMA vs CGBL
BAMA vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts BAMA vs CGBL
Brookstone Active ETF
Price$33.37
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
Volume$409
Net Assets46.11M
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$34.74
Change-$0.14 (-0.40%)
Volume$866
Net Assets3.37B
BAMA vs CGBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMA vs. CGBL commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMA is a StrongBuy and CGBL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.37B vs. BAMA (46.1M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMA: CGBL (12.189) vs BAMA (9.721). BAMA was incepted earlier than CGBL: BAMA (2 years) vs CGBL (2 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than BAMA (0.99). CGBL has a higher turnover BAMA (0.00) vs BAMA (0.00).
| BAMA | CGBL | BAMA / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 9.721 | 12.189 | 80% |
| Net Assets | 46.1M | 3.37B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.33 | 300% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 24.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.37 | 1.89 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMA | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 58% | 16 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PYPY | 11.15 | 0.21 | +1.92% |
| YieldMax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
| PJP | 91.41 | 0.58 | +0.64% |
| Invesco Pharmaceuticals ETF | |||
| QWLD | 139.28 | N/A | N/A |
| SPDR® MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF | |||
| BSCV | 16.79 | -0.03 | -0.18% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corp Bd ETF | |||
| TOGA | 36.02 | -0.16 | -0.44% |
| Tremblant Global ETF | |||
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.32% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||