Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMA vs CLSM
BAMA vs CLSM Comparison
Open Charts BAMA vs CLSM
Brookstone Active ETF
Price$32.39
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
Volume$215
Net Assets43.79M
ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Mod ETF
Price$22.06
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
Volume$100
Net Assets115.27M
BAMA vs CLSM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMA vs. CLSM commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMA is a Hold and CLSM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSM has more net assets: 115M vs. BAMA (43.8M). CLSM has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMA: CLSM (8.326) vs BAMA (6.268). BAMA was incepted earlier than CLSM: BAMA (2 years) vs CLSM (4 years). CLSM (0.79) has a lower expense ratio than BAMA (0.99). CLSM has a higher turnover BAMA (0.00) vs BAMA (0.00).
| BAMA | CLSM | BAMA / CLSM | |
| Gain YTD | 6.268 | 8.326 | 75% |
| Net Assets | 43.8M | 115M | 38% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.79 | 125% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 401.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.36 | 1.98 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMA | CLSM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 85% | 14 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 59% | 7 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLSM and FIG have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLSM and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSM | 100% | +1.02% | ||
| FIG - CLSM | 2% Poorly correlated | +14.21% |