Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMA vs CLSM
BAMA vs CLSM Comparison
Open Charts BAMA vs CLSM
Brookstone Active ETF
Price$33.46
Change+$0.07 (+0.21%)
Volume$338
Net Assets45.07M
ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Mod ETF
Price$22.86
Change+$0.05 (+0.22%)
Volume$100
Net Assets107.37M
BAMA vs CLSM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMA vs. CLSM commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMA is a Hold and CLSM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSM has more net assets: 107M vs. BAMA (45.1M). CLSM has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMA: CLSM (12.422) vs BAMA (9.978). BAMA was incepted earlier than CLSM: BAMA (2 years) vs CLSM (4 years). CLSM (0.82) has a lower expense ratio than BAMA (0.99). CLSM has a higher turnover BAMA (0.00) vs BAMA (0.00).
| BAMA | CLSM | BAMA / CLSM | |
| Gain YTD | 9.978 | 12.422 | 80% |
| Net Assets | 45.1M | 107M | 42% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.82 | 121% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 401.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.31 | 1.84 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMA | CLSM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 87% | 8 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CLSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLSM and FIG have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLSM and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSM | 100% | +0.18% | ||
| FIG - CLSM | 2% Poorly correlated | -2.77% |