Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMA vs CLSM
BAMA vs CLSM Comparison
Open Charts BAMA vs CLSM
Brookstone Active ETF
Price$32.89
Change+$0.06 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.54M
ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Mod ETF
Price$22.26
Change+$0.07 (+0.32%)
Volume$14.07K
Net Assets113.31M
BAMA vs CLSM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMA vs. CLSM commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMA is a StrongBuy and CLSM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSM has more net assets: 113M vs. BAMA (44.5M). CLSM has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMA: CLSM (9.509) vs BAMA (7.926). BAMA was incepted earlier than CLSM: BAMA (2 years) vs CLSM (4 years). CLSM (0.79) has a lower expense ratio than BAMA (0.99). CLSM has a higher turnover BAMA (0.00) vs BAMA (0.00).
| BAMA | CLSM | BAMA / CLSM | |
| Gain YTD | 7.926 | 9.509 | 83% |
| Net Assets | 44.5M | 113M | 39% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.79 | 125% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 401.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.36 | 1.98 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMA | CLSM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 85% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 59% | 14 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLSM and FIG have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLSM and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSM | 100% | +0.31% | ||
| FIG - CLSM | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.97% |