Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMA vs CLSM
BAMA vs CLSM Comparison
Open Charts BAMA vs CLSM
Brookstone Active ETF
Price$32.07
Change+$0.11 (+0.34%)
Volume$2.5K
Net Assets43.31M
ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Mod ETF
Price$21.88
Change+$0.13 (+0.60%)
Volume$125.96K
Net Assets121.64M
BAMA vs CLSM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMA vs. CLSM commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMA is a Buy and CLSM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSM has more net assets: 122M vs. BAMA (43.3M). CLSM has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMA: CLSM (7.616) vs BAMA (5.121). BAMA was incepted earlier than CLSM: BAMA (2 years) vs CLSM (4 years). CLSM (0.79) has a lower expense ratio than BAMA (0.99). CLSM has a higher turnover BAMA (0.00) vs BAMA (0.00).
| BAMA | CLSM | BAMA / CLSM | |
| Gain YTD | 5.121 | 7.616 | 67% |
| Net Assets | 43.3M | 122M | 35% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.79 | 125% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 681.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.37 | 2.00 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMA | CLSM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 58% | 16 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers