Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMA vs CLSM
BAMA vs CLSM Comparison
Open Charts BAMA vs CLSM
Brookstone Active ETF
Price$33.64
Change-$0.11 (-0.33%)
Volume$8.03K
Net Assets46.58M
ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Mod ETF
Price$23.19
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
Volume$21.65K
Net Assets113.9M
BAMA vs CLSM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMA vs. CLSM commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMA is a Buy and CLSM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSM has more net assets: 114M vs. BAMA (46.6M). CLSM has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMA: CLSM (14.044) vs BAMA (10.702). BAMA was incepted earlier than CLSM: BAMA (2 years) vs CLSM (4 years). CLSM (0.79) has a lower expense ratio than BAMA (0.99). CLSM has a higher turnover BAMA (0.00) vs BAMA (0.00).
| BAMA | CLSM | BAMA / CLSM | |
| Gain YTD | 10.702 | 14.044 | 76% |
| Net Assets | 46.6M | 114M | 41% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.79 | 125% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 401.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.33 | 1.88 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMA | CLSM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 36% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 6 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 55% | 14 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...