Ad is loading...
BAMA vs CLSM
BAMA vs CLSM Comparison
Open Charts BAMA vs CLSM
Brookstone Active ETF
Price$28.71
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Volume$2.96K
Net Assets39M
Cabana Target Leading Sector Mod ETF
Price$19.09
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
Volume$12.01K
Net Assets114.87M
BAMA vs CLSM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMA vs. CLSM commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMA is a Hold and CLSM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSM has more net assets: 115M vs. BAMA (39M). CLSM (-6.099) and BAMA (-6.146) have matching annual dividend yield . BAMA was incepted earlier than CLSM: BAMA (2 years) vs CLSM (4 years). CLSM (0.79) has a lower expense ratio than BAMA (0.99). CLSM has a higher turnover BAMA (0.00) vs BAMA (0.00).
| BAMA | CLSM | BAMA / CLSM | |
| Gain YTD | -6.146 | -6.099 | 101% |
| Net Assets | 39M | 115M | 34% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.79 | 125% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 681.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.53 | 2.08 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMA | CLSM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...