Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMBX vs CSQAX
BAMBX vs CSQAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMBX vs. CSQAX commentary
Oct 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMBX is a Hold and CSQAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSQAX pays higher dividends than BAMBX: CSQAX (6.72) vs BAMBX (3.75). BAMBX was incepted earlier than CSQAX: BAMBX (10 years) vs CSQAX (14 years). CSQAX (1.47) is less costly to investors than BAMBX (1.22). BAMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. CSQAX (214.00). CSQAX initial investment is less costly to investors than BAMBX (4%) vs BAMBX (4%). CSQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAMBX: CSQAX (100) vs BAMBX (1000). BAMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.81 vs. CSQAX (0.77). CSQAX (18.40) and BAMBX (18.35) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BAMBX | CSQAX | BAMBX / CSQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.15 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.47 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.469 | -1.122 | -309% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 76% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.06B | N/A | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.75 | 6.72 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.81 | 0.77 | 235% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.56 | 0.00 | 613,827% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.35 | 18.40 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.04 | 15.48 | 226% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers