Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMBX vs DMSFX
BAMBX vs DMSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMBX vs. DMSFX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMBX is a Hold and DMSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.94B vs. DMSFX (555M). DMSFX pays higher dividends than BAMBX: DMSFX (5.88) vs BAMBX (3.74). BAMBX was incepted earlier than DMSFX: BAMBX (10 years) vs DMSFX (9 years). DMSFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than BAMBX (1.22). BAMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. DMSFX (58.00). DMSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAMBX: DMSFX (0) vs BAMBX (1000). DMSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.75 vs. BAMBX (0.64). DMSFX return over 5 years is better than : 29.02 vs. BAMBX (16.53).
| BAMBX | DMSFX | BAMBX / DMSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.32 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.73 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.379 | 3.087 | 77% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.94B | 555M | 1,430% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.74 | 5.88 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.64 | 3.75 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.84 | 23.96 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.53 | 29.02 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement