Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMBX vs DMSFX
BAMBX vs DMSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMBX vs. DMSFX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMBX is a Hold and DMSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.84B vs. DMSFX (556M). DMSFX pays higher dividends than BAMBX: DMSFX (5.92) vs BAMBX (3.79). BAMBX was incepted earlier than DMSFX: BAMBX (10 years) vs DMSFX (8 years). DMSFX (1.73) is less costly to investors than BAMBX (1.22). BAMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. DMSFX (58.00). DMSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAMBX: DMSFX (0) vs BAMBX (1000). DMSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.62 vs. BAMBX (4.06). DMSFX return over 5 years is better than : 29.91 vs. BAMBX (15.07).
| BAMBX | DMSFX | BAMBX / DMSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.32 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.73 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.478 | 1.902 | 130% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.84B | 556M | 1,411% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.79 | 5.92 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.06 | 4.62 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.26 | 22.79 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.07 | 29.91 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement