Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMBX vs DMSZX
BAMBX vs DMSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMBX vs. DMSZX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMBX is a Hold and DMSZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAMBX has more cash in the bank: 8.03B vs. DMSZX (544M). DMSZX pays higher dividends than BAMBX: DMSZX (5.98) vs BAMBX (3.76). BAMBX was incepted earlier than DMSZX: BAMBX (11 years) vs DMSZX (7 years). DMSZX (1.58) is less costly to investors than BAMBX (1.22). BAMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. DMSZX (58.00). DMSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAMBX: DMSZX (0) vs BAMBX (1000). DMSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.81 vs. BAMBX (2.87). DMSZX return over 5 years is better than : 27.30 vs. BAMBX (19.06).
| BAMBX | DMSZX | BAMBX / DMSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.17 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.58 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.469 | 3.902 | 89% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.03B | 544M | 1,477% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.76 | 5.98 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.87 | 3.81 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.25 | 24.79 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.06 | 27.30 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement