Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMBX vs DMSZX
BAMBX vs DMSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMBX vs. DMSZX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMBX is a Hold and DMSZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.74B vs. DMSZX (561M). DMSZX pays higher dividends than BAMBX: DMSZX (6.27) vs BAMBX (3.73). BAMBX was incepted earlier than DMSZX: BAMBX (10 years) vs DMSZX (7 years). DMSZX (1.58) is less costly to investors than BAMBX (1.22). BAMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. DMSZX (58.00). DMSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAMBX: DMSZX (0) vs BAMBX (1000). BAMBX (4.47) and DMSZX (4.38) have marching annual gain over last year. DMSZX return over 5 years is better than : 33.27 vs. BAMBX (14.08).
| BAMBX | DMSZX | BAMBX / DMSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.17 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.58 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.982 | 2.215 | 89% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.74B | 561M | 1,380% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.73 | 6.27 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.47 | 4.38 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.47 | 24.11 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.08 | 33.27 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement