Ad is loading...
BAMBX vs DMSZX
BAMBX vs DMSZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMBX vs. DMSZX commentary
Dec 24, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMBX is a Hold and DMSZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAMBX has more cash in the bank: 6.98B vs. DMSZX (620M). DMSZX pays higher dividends than BAMBX: DMSZX (6.92) vs BAMBX (3.97). BAMBX was incepted earlier than DMSZX: BAMBX (10 years) vs DMSZX (6 years). BAMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 344.00 vs. DMSZX (70.00). DMSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAMBX: DMSZX (0) vs BAMBX (1000). BAMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.91 vs. DMSZX (6.36). DMSZX return over 5 years is better than : 31.74 vs. BAMBX (16.31).
| BAMBX | DMSZX | BAMBX / DMSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.714 | 6.173 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.98B | 620M | 1,126% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.97 | 6.92 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.91 | 6.36 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.08 | 16.70 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.31 | 31.74 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...