Ad is loading...
BAMBX vs DMSZX
BAMBX vs DMSZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMBX vs. DMSZX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMBX is a Hold and DMSZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.49B vs. DMSZX (569M). DMSZX pays higher dividends than BAMBX: DMSZX (6.45) vs BAMBX (3.75). BAMBX was incepted earlier than DMSZX: BAMBX (10 years) vs DMSZX (7 years). DMSZX (1.65) is less costly to investors than BAMBX (1.21). BAMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 344.00 vs. DMSZX (79.00). DMSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAMBX: DMSZX (0) vs BAMBX (1000). BAMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.49 vs. DMSZX (3.14). DMSZX return over 5 years is better than : 49.56 vs. BAMBX (24.20).
| BAMBX | DMSZX | BAMBX / DMSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.22 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.65 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.775 | -0.740 | -375% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.49B | 569M | 1,316% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.75 | 6.45 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.49 | 3.14 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.16 | 15.87 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.20 | 49.56 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers