Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMBX vs FSKKX
BAMBX vs FSKKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMBX vs. FSKKX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMBX is a Hold and FSKKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.93B vs. FSKKX (524M). FSKKX pays higher dividends than BAMBX: FSKKX (5.58) vs BAMBX (3.79). BAMBX was incepted earlier than FSKKX: BAMBX (10 years) vs FSKKX (12 years). FSKKX (3.00) is less costly to investors than BAMBX (1.22). FSKKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 266.59 vs. BAMBX (242.00). BAMBX (1000) and FSKKX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSKKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.19 vs. BAMBX (1.61). BAMBX return over 5 years is better than : 16.42 vs. FSKKX (5.74).
| BAMBX | FSKKX | BAMBX / FSKKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 2.69 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 3.00 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.775 | 4.587 | 60% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.93B | 524M | 1,514% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.79 | 5.58 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.61 | 3.19 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.05 | 10.65 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.42 | 5.74 | 286% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.45 | 15.23 | 239% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers