Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMBX vs FSLTX
BAMBX vs FSLTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAMBX has more cash in the bank: 8.03B vs. FSLTX (2.57B). FSLTX (3.89) and BAMBX (3.76) have matching dividends . BAMBX was incepted earlier than FSLTX: BAMBX (11 years) vs FSLTX (3 years). FSLTX (1.81) is less costly to investors than BAMBX (1.22). BAMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. FSLTX (109.00). FSLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAMBX: FSLTX (0) vs BAMBX (1000). FSLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.92 vs. BAMBX (2.87).
| BAMBX | FSLTX | BAMBX / FSLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.56 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.81 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.469 | 7.176 | 48% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.03B | 2.57B | 313% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.76 | 3.89 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.87 | 7.92 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.25 | 14.24 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.06 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement