Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMBX vs FSLTX
BAMBX vs FSLTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.88B vs. FSLTX (2.56B). FSLTX pays higher dividends than BAMBX: FSLTX (4.00) vs BAMBX (3.79). BAMBX was incepted earlier than FSLTX: BAMBX (10 years) vs FSLTX (3 years). FSLTX (1.81) is less costly to investors than BAMBX (1.22). BAMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. FSLTX (109.00). FSLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAMBX: FSLTX (0) vs BAMBX (1000). FSLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.13 vs. BAMBX (1.69).
| BAMBX | FSLTX | BAMBX / FSLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.56 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.81 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.081 | 4.567 | 46% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.88B | 2.56B | 308% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.79 | 4.00 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.69 | 7.13 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.02 | 11.79 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.96 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers