Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMBX vs FSLTX
BAMBX vs FSLTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.99B vs. FSLTX (2.59B). FSLTX (3.91) and BAMBX (3.75) have matching dividends . BAMBX was incepted earlier than FSLTX: BAMBX (10 years) vs FSLTX (3 years). FSLTX (1.81) is less costly to investors than BAMBX (1.22). BAMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. FSLTX (109.00). FSLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAMBX: FSLTX (0) vs BAMBX (1000). FSLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.41 vs. BAMBX (0.37).
| BAMBX | FSLTX | BAMBX / FSLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.56 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.81 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.478 | 6.132 | 40% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.99B | 2.59B | 309% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.75 | 3.91 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.37 | 7.41 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.55 | 13.01 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.22 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VSOIX | 47.95 | 0.21 | +0.44% |
| Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp I | |||
| UIWGX | 34.36 | 0.13 | +0.38% |
| Victory Sustainable World Institutional | |||
| SGPSX | 84.21 | 0.26 | +0.31% |
| ProFunds Small Cap Growth Svc | |||
| CIAOX | 51.84 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| Capital Advisors Growth Investor | |||
| FCNAX | 49.43 | -0.26 | -0.52% |
| Fidelity Advisor Consumer Discret A | |||