Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMBX vs FSLTX
BAMBX vs FSLTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.99B vs. FSLTX (2.54B). FSLTX pays higher dividends than BAMBX: FSLTX (3.97) vs BAMBX (3.74). BAMBX was incepted earlier than FSLTX: BAMBX (10 years) vs FSLTX (3 years). FSLTX (1.81) is less costly to investors than BAMBX (1.22). BAMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. FSLTX (109.00). FSLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAMBX: FSLTX (0) vs BAMBX (1000). FSLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.77 vs. BAMBX (2.19).
| BAMBX | FSLTX | BAMBX / FSLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.56 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.81 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.370 | 5.193 | 65% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.99B | 2.54B | 315% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.74 | 3.97 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.19 | 7.77 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.31 | 12.35 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.66 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.95 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement