Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMBX vs TNMAX
BAMBX vs TNMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMBX vs. TNMAX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMBX is a Hold and TNMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAMBX has more cash in the bank: 7.95B vs. TNMAX (23.1M). BAMBX pays higher dividends than TNMAX: BAMBX (3.74) vs TNMAX (1.23). BAMBX was incepted earlier than TNMAX: BAMBX (10 years) vs TNMAX (10 years). TNMAX (2.30) is less costly to investors than BAMBX (1.22). BAMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 242.00 vs. TNMAX (34.00). TNMAX initial investment is less costly to investors than BAMBX (4%) vs BAMBX (4%). BAMBX (1000) and TNMAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TNMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.80 vs. BAMBX (1.32). BAMBX return over 5 years is better than : 17.10 vs. TNMAX (11.98).
| BAMBX | TNMAX | BAMBX / TNMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.52 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 2.30 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.775 | 9.601 | 29% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 73% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.95B | 23.1M | 34,407% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.74 | 1.23 | 305% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.32 | 9.80 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.17 | 22.68 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.10 | 11.98 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.31 | 20.86 | 174% |