Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMO vs CGBL
BAMO vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts BAMO vs CGBL
Brookstone Opportunities ETF
Price$31.85
Change+$0.06 (+0.19%)
Volume$3.68K
Net Assets41.5M
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$34.06
Change-$0.17 (-0.50%)
Volume$5.13K
Net Assets3.14B
BAMO vs CGBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMO vs. CGBL commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMO is a Buy and CGBL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.14B vs. BAMO (41.5M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMO: CGBL (10.446) vs BAMO (5.354). BAMO was incepted earlier than CGBL: BAMO (2 years) vs CGBL (2 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than BAMO (1.06). CGBL has a higher turnover BAMO (0.00) vs BAMO (0.00).
| BAMO | CGBL | BAMO / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 5.354 | 10.446 | 51% |
| Net Assets | 41.5M | 3.14B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.33 | 321% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 24.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.38 | 1.91 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMO | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 5 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 51% | 9 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NMS | 11.31 | 0.06 | +0.49% |
| Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund | |||
| INFL | 42.91 | 0.21 | +0.49% |
| Horizon Kinetics Inflation Bnfcrs ETF | |||
| MCR | 6.40 | 0.03 | +0.47% |
| MFS Charter Income Trust | |||
| MVAL | 34.62 | N/A | N/A |
| VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF | |||
| LIAV | 232.36 | N/A | N/A |
| LifeX 2061 Infl-Prt Longevity Inc ETF | |||
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.38% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
More | ||||