Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMO vs CGBL
BAMO vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts BAMO vs CGBL
Brookstone Opportunities ETF
Price$30.61
Change+$0.10 (+0.33%)
Volume$2.71K
Net Assets40M
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$32.61
Change+$0.07 (+0.22%)
Volume$702.64K
Net Assets2.3B
BAMO vs CGBL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMO vs. CGBL commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMO is a Buy and CGBL is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 2.31B vs. BAMO (40M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMO: CGBL (4.702) vs BAMO (1.264). BAMO was incepted earlier than CGBL: BAMO (2 years) vs CGBL (2 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than BAMO (1.06). CGBL has a higher turnover BAMO (0.00) vs BAMO (0.00).
| BAMO | CGBL | BAMO / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 1.264 | 4.702 | 27% |
| Net Assets | 40M | 2.31B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.33 | 321% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 24.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.42 | 1.92 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMO | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 52% | 18 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TDVG | 41.81 | 0.31 | +0.75% |
| T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF | |||
| JPSV | 55.19 | N/A | N/A |
| JPMorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF | |||
| FEP | 47.32 | -0.03 | -0.06% |
| First Trust Europe AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| SPSB | 29.94 | -0.04 | -0.13% |
| SPDR® Portfolio Short Term Corp Bd ETF | |||
| DGP | 100.30 | -2.87 | -2.78% |
| DB Gold Double Long ETN | |||
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.22% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +1.95% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +2.29% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +2.43% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +2.29% | ||
| IR - CGBL | 74% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
More | ||||