Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMO vs CGBL
BAMO vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts BAMO vs CGBL
Brookstone Opportunities ETF
Price$31.98
Change+$0.04 (+0.13%)
Volume$106
Net Assets42.19M
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$34.87
Change+$0.10 (+0.29%)
Volume$1.64K
Net Assets3.37B
BAMO vs CGBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMO vs. CGBL commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMO is a Buy and CGBL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.37B vs. BAMO (42.2M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMO: CGBL (12.479) vs BAMO (6.307). BAMO was incepted earlier than CGBL: BAMO (2 years) vs CGBL (2 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than BAMO (1.06). CGBL has a higher turnover BAMO (0.00) vs BAMO (0.00).
| BAMO | CGBL | BAMO / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 6.307 | 12.479 | 51% |
| Net Assets | 42.2M | 3.37B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.33 | 321% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 24.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.44 | 1.89 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMO | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 36% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 80% | 8 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PDP | 116.74 | 1.79 | +1.56% |
| Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | |||
| FTCE | 24.04 | 0.35 | +1.49% |
| First Trust New Cstrcts Cr Erns Ldrs ETF | |||
| SEPW | 31.27 | 0.04 | +0.14% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer20 Sep ETF | |||
| AAPY | 23.41 | 0.02 | +0.10% |
| Kurv Yield Premium Str Apple ETF | |||
| PSMO | 30.03 | N/A | N/A |
| Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF | |||
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.26% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | +2.76% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | +3.42% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +3.36% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +2.53% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +2.91% | ||
More | ||||