Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMO vs CLSM
BAMO vs CLSM Comparison
Open Charts BAMO vs CLSM
Brookstone Opportunities ETF
Price$32.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.82K
Net Assets42.79M
ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Mod ETF
Price$23.19
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
Volume$21.65K
Net Assets113.9M
BAMO vs CLSM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMO vs. CLSM commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMO is a Buy and CLSM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSM has more net assets: 114M vs. BAMO (42.8M). CLSM has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMO: CLSM (14.044) vs BAMO (6.860). BAMO was incepted earlier than CLSM: BAMO (2 years) vs CLSM (4 years). CLSM (0.79) has a lower expense ratio than BAMO (1.06). CLSM has a higher turnover BAMO (0.00) vs BAMO (0.00).
| BAMO | CLSM | BAMO / CLSM | |
| Gain YTD | 6.860 | 14.044 | 49% |
| Net Assets | 42.8M | 114M | 38% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.79 | 134% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 401.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.42 | 1.88 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMO | CLSM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 32% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 6 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 46% | 14 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 35% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...