Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAMO vs GDMA
BAMO vs GDMA Comparison
Open Charts BAMO vs GDMA
Brookstone Opportunities ETF
Price$31.26
Change+$0.07 (+0.22%)
Volume$5.82K
Net Assets40.55M
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
Price$35.45
Change+$0.17 (+0.48%)
Volume$2.44K
Net Assets140.31M
BAMO vs GDMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAMO vs. GDMA commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAMO is a StrongBuy and GDMA is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GDMA has more net assets: 140M vs. BAMO (40.6M). GDMA has a higher annual dividend yield than BAMO: GDMA (12.095) vs BAMO (3.414). BAMO was incepted earlier than GDMA: BAMO (2 years) vs GDMA (7 years). GDMA (0.78) has a lower expense ratio than BAMO (1.06). GDMA has a higher turnover BAMO (0.00) vs BAMO (0.00).
| BAMO | GDMA | BAMO / GDMA | |
| Gain YTD | 3.414 | 12.095 | 28% |
| Net Assets | 40.6M | 140M | 29% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.78 | 136% |
| Turnover | 0.00 | 674.00 | - |
| Yield | 1.39 | 2.11 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BAMO | GDMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 52% | 11 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GDMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GDMA and NEM have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDMA and NEM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDMA | 100% | +0.48% | ||
| NEM - GDMA | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.79% | ||
| LMT - GDMA | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
| AEE - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.44% | ||
| NOC - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.79% | ||
| DLTR - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.44% | ||
More | ||||