BANC
Price
$16.18
Change
+$0.32 (+2.02%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.29B
4 days until earnings call
PNFP
Price
$119.91
Change
+$1.85 (+1.57%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
6.62B
2 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BANC vs PNFP

Header iconBANC vs PNFP Comparison
Open Charts BANC vs PNFPBanner chart's image
Banc of California
Price$16.18
Change+$0.32 (+2.02%)
Volume$1.7M
Capitalization2.29B
Pinnacle Financial Partners
Price$119.91
Change+$1.85 (+1.57%)
Volume$842.56K
Capitalization6.62B
BANC vs PNFP Comparison Chart
Loading...
BANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BANC vs. PNFP commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BANC is a Hold and PNFP is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BANC: $16.18 vs. PNFP: $119.91)
Brand notoriety: BANC and PNFP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BANC: 90% vs. PNFP: 182%
Market capitalization -- BANC: $2.29B vs. PNFP: $6.62B
BANC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.29B. PNFP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BANC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePNFP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BANC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PNFP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PNFP is a better buy in the long-term than BANC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BANC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNFP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BANC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PNFP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PNFP is a better buy in the short-term than BANC.

Price Growth

BANC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +8.88% price change this week, while PNFP (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

BANC is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

PNFP is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNFP($6.62B) has a higher market cap than BANC($2.29B). PNFP has higher P/E ratio than BANC: PNFP (11.70) vs BANC (6.84). PNFP (4.826) and BANC (4.657) have similar YTD gains . PNFP has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. BANC (45.9M). PNFP has less debt than BANC: PNFP (2.56B) vs BANC (3.85B). PNFP has higher revenues than BANC: PNFP (1.38B) vs BANC (278M).
BANCPNFPBANC / PNFP
Capitalization2.29B6.62B35%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.6574.82697%
P/E Ratio6.8411.7058%
Revenue278M1.38B20%
Total Cash45.9M229M20%
Total Debt3.85B2.56B150%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BANC vs PNFP: Fundamental Ratings
BANC
PNFP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8327
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8733
SMR RATING
1..100
1110
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4340
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9110
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BANC's Valuation (67) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (92). This means that BANC’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BANC (87). This means that PNFP’s stock grew somewhat faster than BANC’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's SMR Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BANC (11). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to BANC’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BANC (43). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to BANC’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BANC (91). This means that PNFP’s stock grew significantly faster than BANC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BANCPNFP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MFEGX188.022.07
+1.11%
MFS Growth A
FNRAX33.260.26
+0.79%
Franklin Natural Resources Adv
JVTNX87.450.44
+0.51%
Janus Henderson Venture N
MRRFX16.750.07
+0.42%
BlackRock Mid-Cap Value R
MIZIX7.860.03
+0.38%
MassMutual International Eq I

BANC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BANC has been closely correlated with SSB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BANC jumps, then SSB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BANC
1D Price
Change %
BANC100%
+2.02%
SSB - BANC
76%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
UBSI - BANC
76%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
PPBI - BANC
74%
Closely correlated
+1.70%
PNFP - BANC
74%
Closely correlated
+1.57%
HWC - BANC
74%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
More

PNFP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNFP has been closely correlated with HWC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNFP jumps, then HWC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNFP
1D Price
Change %
PNFP100%
+1.57%
HWC - PNFP
89%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
SSB - PNFP
88%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
ABCB - PNFP
87%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
ZION - PNFP
87%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
SNV - PNFP
87%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
More