BANC
Price
$14.60
Change
+$0.52 (+3.69%)
Updated
May 17, 6:59 PM EST
67 days until earnings call
PNFP
Price
$83.03
Change
-$0.52 (-0.62%)
Updated
May 17, 6:59 PM EST
58 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BANC vs PNFP

Header iconBANC vs PNFP Comparison
Open Charts BANC vs PNFPBanner chart's image
Banc of California
Price$14.60
Change+$0.52 (+3.69%)
Volume$900.91K
CapitalizationN/A
Pinnacle Financial Partners
Price$83.03
Change-$0.52 (-0.62%)
Volume$172K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BANC vs PNFP Comparison Chart

Loading...

BANCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
PNFPDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
BANC vs. PNFP commentary
May 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BANC is a StrongSell and PNFP is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BANC: $14.59 vs. PNFP: $83.03)
Brand notoriety: BANC and PNFP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BANC: 91% vs. PNFP: 74%
Market capitalization -- BANC: $2.29B vs. PNFP: $6.62B
BANC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.29B. PNFP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BANC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePNFP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BANC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PNFP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PNFP is a better buy in the long-term than BANC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BANC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNFP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BANC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PNFP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PNFP is a better buy in the short-term than BANC.

Price Growth

BANC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.25% price change this week, while PNFP (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

BANC is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2024.

PNFP is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for BANC with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for PNFP with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNFP($6.62B) has a higher market cap than BANC($2.29B). PNFP has higher P/E ratio than BANC: PNFP (11.70) vs BANC (6.84). BANC YTD gains are higher at: 9.375 vs. PNFP (-4.566). PNFP has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. BANC (45.9M). PNFP has less debt than BANC: PNFP (2.56B) vs BANC (3.85B). PNFP has higher revenues than BANC: PNFP (1.38B) vs BANC (278M).
BANCPNFPBANC / PNFP
Capitalization2.29B6.62B35%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.375-4.566-205%
P/E Ratio6.8411.7058%
Revenue278M1.38B20%
Total Cash45.9M229M20%
Total Debt3.85B2.56B150%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BANC vs PNFP: Fundamental Ratings
BANC
PNFP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8156
SMR RATING
1..100
1710
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4745
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8719
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PNFP's Valuation (81) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BANC (86). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to BANC’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BANC (81). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to BANC’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's SMR Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BANC (17). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to BANC’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BANC (47). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to BANC’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BANC (87). This means that PNFP’s stock grew significantly faster than BANC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BANCPNFP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BANCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
PNFPDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VEIPX43.720.14
+0.32%
Vanguard Equity-Income Inv
OARDX25.500.03
+0.12%
Invesco Rising Dividends A
TIHAX12.370.01
+0.08%
Transamerica International Stock A
GLNKX21.680.01
+0.05%
MFS Global New Discovery R2
MIFOX27.13-0.01
-0.04%
Marsico Focus Institutional

BANC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BANC has been closely correlated with CATY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BANC jumps, then CATY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BANC
1D Price
Change %
BANC100%
+3.55%
CATY - BANC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.47%
BKU - BANC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
ONB - BANC
76%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
FNB - BANC
76%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
PNFP - BANC
76%
Closely correlated
-0.62%
More

PNFP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNFP has been closely correlated with ABCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNFP jumps, then ABCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNFP
1D Price
Change %
PNFP100%
-0.62%
ABCB - PNFP
86%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
SSB - PNFP
86%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
FNB - PNFP
86%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
WBS - PNFP
85%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
HWC - PNFP
85%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
More