PNFP
Price
$96.14
Change
+$1.51 (+1.60%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.12B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SSB
Price
$101.91
Change
+$1.30 (+1.29%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.86B
26 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PNFP vs SSB

PNFP vs SSB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PNFP vs. SSB commentary
Oct 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNFP is a StrongBuy and SSB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PNFP vs SSB: Fundamental Ratings
PNFP
SSB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8264
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9336
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5654
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3573
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SSB's Valuation (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (50). This means that SSB’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

SSB's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNFP (93). This means that SSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

SSB's SMR Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (9). This means that SSB’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

SSB's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (56). This means that SSB’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SSB (73). This means that PNFP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SSB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PNFPSSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 03, 2026
Stock price -- (PNFP: $94.63 vs. SSB: $100.61)
Brand notoriety: PNFP and SSB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PNFP: 167% vs. SSB: 118%
Market capitalization -- PNFP: $14.12B vs. SSB: $9.86B
PNFP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $14.12B. SSB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $9.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PNFP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while SSB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PNFP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SSB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PNFP and SSB are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PNFP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PNFP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SSB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PNFP is a better buy in the short-term than SSB.

Price Growth

PNFP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.80% price change this week, while SSB (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

PNFP is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

SSB is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.68% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
PNFP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SSB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAV.X0.0116040.000042
+0.36%
Maverick Protocol cryptocurrency
CHZ.X0.016146-0.000112
-0.69%
Chiliz cryptocurrency
TRX.X0.334826-0.002552
-0.76%
TRON cryptocurrency
WAVES.X0.296011-0.002579
-0.86%
Waves cryptocurrency
PDA.X0.000979-0.000026
-2.59%
PlayDapp cryptocurrency

PNFP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNFP has been closely correlated with ONB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNFP jumps, then ONB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNFP
1D Price
Change %
PNFP100%
+1.09%
ONB - PNFP
82%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
SSB - PNFP
82%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
WTFC - PNFP
81%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
ASB - PNFP
80%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
FITB - PNFP
80%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
More

SSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSB has been closely correlated with AUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SSB jumps, then AUB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSB
1D Price
Change %
SSB100%
+1.05%
AUB - SSB
88%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
ONB - SSB
87%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
UCB - SSB
86%
Closely correlated
+1.26%
FULT - SSB
86%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
ASB - SSB
86%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
More