BANC
Price
$14.06
Change
-$0.04 (-0.28%)
Updated
Jun 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.29B
32 days until earnings call
WDFN
Price
$20.90
Change
+$0.40 (+1.95%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
47.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BANC vs WDFN

Header iconBANC vs WDFN Comparison
Open Charts BANC vs WDFNBanner chart's image
Banc of California
Price$14.06
Change-$0.04 (-0.28%)
Volume$16.46K
Capitalization2.29B
Woodlands Financial Services
Price$20.90
Change+$0.40 (+1.95%)
Volume$148
Capitalization47.06M
BANC vs WDFN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BANC vs. WDFN commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BANC is a Buy and WDFN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BANC: $14.07 vs. WDFN: $20.90)
Brand notoriety: BANC and WDFN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BANC: 107% vs. WDFN: 19%
Market capitalization -- BANC: $2.29B vs. WDFN: $47.06M
BANC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.29B. WDFN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $47.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BANC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWDFN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BANC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WDFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BANC is a better buy in the long-term than WDFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BANC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BANC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BANC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.96% price change this week, while WDFN (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

BANC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

WDFN is expected to report earnings on Apr 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BANC($2.29B) has a higher market cap than WDFN($47.1M). WDFN YTD gains are higher at: 7.258 vs. BANC (-7.630). BANC has more cash in the bank: 45.9M vs. WDFN (7.33M). WDFN has less debt than BANC: WDFN (14M) vs BANC (3.85B). BANC has higher revenues than WDFN: BANC (278M) vs WDFN (18.1M).
BANCWDFNBANC / WDFN
Capitalization2.29B47.1M4,868%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.6307.258-105%
P/E Ratio6.84N/A-
Revenue278M18.1M1,536%
Total Cash45.9M7.33M626%
Total Debt3.85B14M27,486%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BANC vs WDFN: Fundamental Ratings
BANC
WDFN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
586
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6691
SMR RATING
1..100
1158
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5657
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8575
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WDFN's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as BANC (33) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WDFN’s stock grew similarly to BANC’s over the last 12 months.

BANC's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WDFN (91) in the null industry. This means that BANC’s stock grew similarly to WDFN’s over the last 12 months.

BANC's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WDFN (58) in the null industry. This means that BANC’s stock grew somewhat faster than WDFN’s over the last 12 months.

BANC's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WDFN (57) in the null industry. This means that BANC’s stock grew similarly to WDFN’s over the last 12 months.

WDFN's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as BANC (85) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WDFN’s stock grew similarly to BANC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BANC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSEU42.190.38
+0.92%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Europe Eq ETF
DUKQ25.640.09
+0.36%
Ocean Park Domestic ETF
BCD33.280.02
+0.07%
abrdn Blmb AllCmdLDSK1Fr ETF
KRE59.45-0.03
-0.05%
SPDR® S&P Regional Banking ETF
PSI59.96-0.35
-0.58%
Invesco Semiconductors ETF

BANC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BANC has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BANC jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BANC
1D Price
Change %
BANC100%
-0.21%
TRMK - BANC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
UBSI - BANC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
COLB - BANC
83%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
SSB - BANC
83%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
ABCB - BANC
82%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
More

WDFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WDFN and PRMY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WDFN and PRMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WDFN
1D Price
Change %
WDFN100%
N/A
PRMY - WDFN
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
BANC - WDFN
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
KNFSF - WDFN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DB - WDFN
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
FUSB - WDFN
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.77%
More