BANC
Price
$13.21
Change
+$0.24 (+1.85%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.29B
5 days until earnings call
WDFN
Price
$20.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
47.06M
Ad is loading...

BANC vs WDFN

Header iconBANC vs WDFN Comparison
Open Charts BANC vs WDFNBanner chart's image
Banc of California
Price$13.21
Change+$0.24 (+1.85%)
Volume$2.78M
Capitalization2.29B
Woodlands Financial Services
Price$20.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$926
Capitalization47.06M
BANC vs WDFN Comparison Chart
Loading...
BANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BANC vs. WDFN commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BANC is a Hold and WDFN is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BANC: $13.21 vs. WDFN: $20.00)
Brand notoriety: BANC and WDFN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BANC: 92% vs. WDFN: 122%
Market capitalization -- BANC: $2.29B vs. WDFN: $47.06M
BANC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.29B. WDFN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $47.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BANC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWDFN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BANC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WDFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BANC is a better buy in the long-term than WDFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BANC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BANC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BANC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +9.17% price change this week, while WDFN (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

BANC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BANC($2.29B) has a higher market cap than WDFN($47.1M). WDFN YTD gains are higher at: 1.239 vs. BANC (-13.912). BANC has more cash in the bank: 45.9M vs. WDFN (7.33M). WDFN has less debt than BANC: WDFN (14M) vs BANC (3.85B). BANC has higher revenues than WDFN: BANC (278M) vs WDFN (18.1M).
BANCWDFNBANC / WDFN
Capitalization2.29B47.1M4,868%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-13.9121.239-1,123%
P/E Ratio6.84N/A-
Revenue278M18.1M1,536%
Total Cash45.9M7.33M626%
Total Debt3.85B14M27,486%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BANC vs WDFN: Fundamental Ratings
BANC
WDFN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
785
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5679
SMR RATING
1..100
890
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7556
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6555
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WDFN's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as BANC (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WDFN’s stock grew similarly to BANC’s over the last 12 months.

BANC's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WDFN (79) in the null industry. This means that BANC’s stock grew similarly to WDFN’s over the last 12 months.

BANC's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for WDFN (90) in the null industry. This means that BANC’s stock grew significantly faster than WDFN’s over the last 12 months.

WDFN's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as BANC (75) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WDFN’s stock grew similarly to BANC’s over the last 12 months.

WDFN's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as BANC (65) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WDFN’s stock grew similarly to BANC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BANC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EOS.X0.6251090.027900
+4.67%
EOS cryptocurrency
SCRT.X0.1724940.002024
+1.19%
Secret cryptocurrency
CTXC.X0.0597850.000283
+0.48%
Cortex cryptocurrency
BETH.X1582.4240004.741699
+0.30%
Beacon ETH cryptocurrency
POLY.X0.312701-0.021404
-6.41%
Polymath cryptocurrency

WDFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WDFN and PRMY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WDFN and PRMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WDFN
1D Price
Change %
WDFN100%
N/A
PRMY - WDFN
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BANC - WDFN
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
KNFSF - WDFN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DB - WDFN
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
FUSB - WDFN
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More