BANC
Price
$16.18
Change
+$0.32 (+2.02%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.29B
4 days until earnings call
WDFN
Price
$22.00
Change
+$0.08 (+0.36%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
47.06M
Ad is loading...

BANC vs WDFN

Header iconBANC vs WDFN Comparison
Open Charts BANC vs WDFNBanner chart's image
Banc of California
Price$16.18
Change+$0.32 (+2.02%)
Volume$1.7M
Capitalization2.29B
Woodlands Financial Services
Price$22.00
Change+$0.08 (+0.36%)
Volume$100
Capitalization47.06M
BANC vs WDFN Comparison Chart
Loading...
BANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BANC vs. WDFN commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BANC is a Hold and WDFN is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BANC: $16.18 vs. WDFN: $22.00)
Brand notoriety: BANC and WDFN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BANC: 90% vs. WDFN: 13%
Market capitalization -- BANC: $2.29B vs. WDFN: $47.06M
BANC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.29B. WDFN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $47.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BANC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWDFN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BANC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WDFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WDFN is a better buy in the long-term than BANC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BANC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WDFN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BANC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WDFN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WDFN is a better buy in the short-term than BANC.

Price Growth

BANC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +8.88% price change this week, while WDFN (@Regional Banks) price change was +9.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

BANC is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BANC($2.29B) has a higher market cap than WDFN($47.1M). WDFN YTD gains are higher at: 10.000 vs. BANC (4.657). BANC has more cash in the bank: 45.9M vs. WDFN (7.33M). WDFN has less debt than BANC: WDFN (14M) vs BANC (3.85B). BANC has higher revenues than WDFN: BANC (278M) vs WDFN (18.1M).
BANCWDFNBANC / WDFN
Capitalization2.29B47.1M4,868%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.65710.00047%
P/E Ratio6.84N/A-
Revenue278M18.1M1,536%
Total Cash45.9M7.33M626%
Total Debt3.85B14M27,486%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BANC vs WDFN: Fundamental Ratings
BANC
WDFN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87100
SMR RATING
1..100
1193
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4343
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9150
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WDFN's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BANC (67) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WDFN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BANC’s over the last 12 months.

BANC's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WDFN (100) in the null industry. This means that BANC’s stock grew similarly to WDFN’s over the last 12 months.

BANC's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for WDFN (93) in the null industry. This means that BANC’s stock grew significantly faster than WDFN’s over the last 12 months.

BANC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WDFN (43) in the null industry. This means that BANC’s stock grew similarly to WDFN’s over the last 12 months.

WDFN's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BANC (91) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WDFN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BANC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BANCWDFN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
72%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BANC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WDFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MFEGX188.022.07
+1.11%
MFS Growth A
FNRAX33.260.26
+0.79%
Franklin Natural Resources Adv
JVTNX87.450.44
+0.51%
Janus Henderson Venture N
MRRFX16.750.07
+0.42%
BlackRock Mid-Cap Value R
MIZIX7.860.03
+0.38%
MassMutual International Eq I

BANC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BANC has been closely correlated with SSB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BANC jumps, then SSB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BANC
1D Price
Change %
BANC100%
+2.02%
SSB - BANC
76%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
UBSI - BANC
76%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
PPBI - BANC
74%
Closely correlated
+1.70%
PNFP - BANC
74%
Closely correlated
+1.57%
HWC - BANC
74%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
More

WDFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WDFN and PRMY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WDFN and PRMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WDFN
1D Price
Change %
WDFN100%
+0.36%
PRMY - WDFN
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BANC - WDFN
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
KNFSF - WDFN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DB - WDFN
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
FUSB - WDFN
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.78%
More