Advertisement
BAND vs DNACF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAND is a Hold and DNACF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BAND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDNACF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BAND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- DNACF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BAND’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DNACF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BAND’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- DNACF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
BAND (@Computer Communications) experienced а -3.82% price change this week, while DNACF (@Industrial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -7.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.84%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +1.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.97%.
Reported Earning Dates
BAND is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-7.49% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Industrial Conglomerates (+1.87% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
| BAND | DNACF | BAND / DNACF | |
| Capitalization | 422M | 1.72B | 24% |
| EBITDA | 39M | -24.36B | -0% |
| Gain YTD | -18.684 | -18.510 | 101% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 7.08 | - |
| Revenue | 756M | 132B | 1% |
| Total Cash | 80.4M | 76.2B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 480M | 44.4B | 1% |
BAND | DNACF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 7 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DNACF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAND (93) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that DNACF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAND’s over the last 12 months.
DNACF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BAND (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that DNACF’s stock grew similarly to BAND’s over the last 12 months.
BAND's SMR Rating (89) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as DNACF (95) in the null industry. This means that BAND’s stock grew similarly to DNACF’s over the last 12 months.
DNACF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as BAND (61) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that DNACF’s stock grew similarly to BAND’s over the last 12 months.
BAND's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as DNACF (96) in the null industry. This means that BAND’s stock grew similarly to DNACF’s over the last 12 months.
| BAND | DNACF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 38% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 34% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 75% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 43% |
Advertisement
BAND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAND has been loosely correlated with CMRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAND jumps, then CMRC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BAND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAND | 100% | -1.91% | ||
| CMRC - BAND | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| FIVN - BAND | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.67% | ||
| ONTF - BAND | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| GTLB - BAND | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| LAW - BAND | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||
DNACF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DNACF and EXSPF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNACF and EXSPF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DNACF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNACF | 100% | N/A | ||
| EXSPF - DNACF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PSSWF - DNACF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PANW - DNACF | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.55% | ||
| BAND - DNACF | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.91% | ||
| DAVA - DNACF | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.45% | ||
More | ||||