BAND vs DNACF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAND is a Sell and DNACF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BAND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDNACF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BAND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- DNACF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BAND’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BAND’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BAND (@Packaged Software) experienced а -5.50% price change this week, while DNACF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.
Reported Earning Dates
BAND is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| BAND | DNACF | BAND / DNACF | |
| Capitalization | 461M | 1.38B | 33% |
| EBITDA | 23.2M | 15.2B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 28.334 | 28.392 | 100% |
| P/E Ratio | 357.14 | 23.26 | 1,536% |
| Revenue | 601M | 133B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 153M | 103B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 645M | 45B | 1% |
BAND | DNACF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DNACF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BAND (90) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that DNACF’s stock grew significantly faster than BAND’s over the last 12 months.
DNACF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BAND (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that DNACF’s stock grew similarly to BAND’s over the last 12 months.
DNACF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as BAND (88) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that DNACF’s stock grew similarly to BAND’s over the last 12 months.
DNACF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BAND (46) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that DNACF’s stock grew similarly to BAND’s over the last 12 months.
DNACF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BAND (88) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that DNACF’s stock grew significantly faster than BAND’s over the last 12 months.
| BAND | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% |
BAND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAND has been loosely correlated with FLYW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAND jumps, then FLYW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BAND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAND | 100% | -1.38% | ||
| FLYW - BAND | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| BIGC - BAND | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.10% | ||
| COIN - BAND | 46% Loosely correlated | +9.69% | ||
| APPN - BAND | 46% Loosely correlated | -3.11% | ||
| CLSK - BAND | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
More | ||||
DNACF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DNACF and RADLF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNACF and RADLF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DNACF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNACF | 100% | N/A | ||
| RADLF - DNACF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EXSPF - DNACF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PSSWF - DNACF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PANW - DNACF | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.87% | ||
| BAND - DNACF | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.38% | ||
More | ||||