BANF
Price
$113.53
Change
+$1.24 (+1.10%)
Updated
Aug 11, 02:43 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.77B
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BUSE
Price
$31.10
Change
+$0.28 (+0.91%)
Updated
Aug 11, 02:46 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.55B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BANF vs BUSE

BANF vs BUSE Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BANF vs. BUSE commentary
Aug 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BANF is a Buy and BUSE is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2026
Stock price -- (BANF: $112.29 vs. BUSE: $30.82)
Brand notoriety: BANF and BUSE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BANF: 27% vs. BUSE: 57%
Market capitalization -- BANF: $3.77B vs. BUSE: $2.55B
BANF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.77B. BUSE’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BANF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBUSE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BANF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BUSE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BUSE is a better buy in the long-term than BANF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BANF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BUSE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BANF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BUSE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BUSE is a better buy in the short-term than BANF.

Price Growth

BANF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.50% price change this week, while BUSE (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

BANF is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.

BUSE is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.82% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BANF($3.77B) has a higher market cap than BUSE($2.55B). BANF has higher P/E ratio than BUSE: BANF (15.16) vs BUSE (12.58). BUSE YTD gains are higher at: 33.342 vs. BANF (6.854). BANF has more cash in the bank: 254M vs. BUSE (169M). BANF has less debt than BUSE: BANF (101M) vs BUSE (506M). BUSE has higher revenues than BANF: BUSE (791M) vs BANF (705M).
BANFBUSEBANF / BUSE
Capitalization3.77B2.55B148%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.85433.34221%
P/E Ratio15.1612.58121%
Revenue705M791M89%
Total Cash254M169M150%
Total Debt101M506M20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BANF vs BUSE: Fundamental Ratings
BANF
BUSE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3642
SMR RATING
1..100
3637
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5842
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6482
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BUSE's Valuation (25) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BANF (78). This means that BUSE’s stock grew somewhat faster than BANF’s over the last 12 months.

BANF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (42). This means that BANF’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

BANF's SMR Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (37). This means that BANF’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BANF (58). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to BANF’s over the last 12 months.

BANF's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (82). This means that BANF’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BANFBUSE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BANF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BUSE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLOW43.440.46
+1.08%
Global X U.S. Cash Flow Kings 100 ETF
KHPI26.34N/A
N/A
Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF
XRPC11.73N/A
N/A
Canary XRP ETF
SPGP128.14-0.17
-0.13%
Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF
FTHF44.88-0.61
-1.35%
FT EM Human Flourishing ETF

BANF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BANF has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BANF jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BANF
1D Price
Change %
BANF100%
-0.64%
TRMK - BANF
84%
Closely correlated
-0.25%
BUSE - BANF
83%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
STBA - BANF
83%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
FNB - BANF
83%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
EFSC - BANF
83%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
More

BUSE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUSE has been closely correlated with PRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUSE jumps, then PRK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUSE
1D Price
Change %
BUSE100%
-0.52%
PRK - BUSE
88%
Closely correlated
-1.21%
EFSC - BUSE
87%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
TRMK - BUSE
86%
Closely correlated
-0.25%
SHBI - BUSE
85%
Closely correlated
-1.01%
BY - BUSE
85%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
More