BANF
Price
$90.43
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
58 days until earnings call
FFBC
Price
$23.32
Change
+$0.14 (+0.60%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
58 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BANF vs FFBC

Header iconBANF vs FFBC Comparison
Open Charts BANF vs FFBCBanner chart's image
BancFirst
Price$90.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14.59K
CapitalizationN/A
First Financial Ban
Price$23.32
Change+$0.14 (+0.60%)
Volume$98.94K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BANF vs FFBC Comparison Chart

Loading...

BANFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
FFBCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
BANF vs. FFBC commentary
May 21, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BANF is a Buy and FFBC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 21, 2024
Stock price -- (BANF: $92.07 vs. FFBC: $23.66)
Brand notoriety: BANF and FFBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BANF: 55% vs. FFBC: 89%
Market capitalization -- BANF: $2.9B vs. FFBC: $2.08B
BANF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.9B. FFBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BANF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFFBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BANF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FFBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BANF and FFBC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BANF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BANF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • FFBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the short-term than BANF.

Price Growth

BANF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.90% price change this week, while FFBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

BANF is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2024.

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.77% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for BANF with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for FFBC with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BANF($2.9B) has a higher market cap than FFBC($2.08B). BANF has higher P/E ratio than FFBC: BANF (13.56) vs FFBC (8.15). FFBC YTD gains are higher at: 0.690 vs. BANF (-4.925). BANF has more cash in the bank: 225M vs. FFBC (213M). BANF has less debt than FFBC: BANF (86.1M) vs FFBC (1.28B). FFBC has higher revenues than BANF: FFBC (840M) vs BANF (610M).
BANFFFBCBANF / FFBC
Capitalization2.9B2.08B139%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.9250.690-714%
P/E Ratio13.568.15166%
Revenue610M840M73%
Total Cash225M213M106%
Total Debt86.1M1.28B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BANF vs FFBC: Fundamental Ratings
BANF
FFBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2016
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3471
SMR RATING
1..100
1212
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5347
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4636
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFBC's Valuation (56) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BANF (95). This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BANF’s over the last 12 months.

BANF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFBC (71). This means that BANF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

BANF's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (12). This means that BANF’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BANF (53). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to BANF’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BANF (46). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to BANF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BANFFFBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BANFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
FFBCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACFLX10.720.03
+0.28%
American Century Focused Lg Cap Val G
RWIEX65.900.12
+0.18%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc R4
AZBIX23.940.02
+0.08%
Virtus Small-Cap Institutional
HESAX40.51-0.02
-0.05%
Horizon Defensive Core Advisor
VIISX19.00-0.04
-0.21%
Virtus KAR International Small-Mid Cap I

BANF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BANF has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BANF jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BANF
1D Price
Change %
BANF100%
+0.85%
FFBC - BANF
80%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
TOWN - BANF
80%
Closely correlated
+1.40%
HOMB - BANF
79%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
PFS - BANF
79%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
BUSE - BANF
79%
Closely correlated
+0.67%
More

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with BUSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then BUSE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
+0.21%
BUSE - FFBC
89%
Closely correlated
+0.67%
FCF - FFBC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
HOMB - FFBC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
WSBC - FFBC
86%
Closely correlated
+1.15%
FRME - FFBC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
More