BANF
Price
$110.43
Change
+$3.93 (+3.69%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.68B
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FNLC
Price
$25.59
Change
+$0.85 (+3.44%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Capitalization
287.21M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BANF vs FNLC

Header iconBANF vs FNLC Comparison
Open Charts BANF vs FNLCBanner chart's image
BancFirst
Price$110.43
Change+$3.93 (+3.69%)
Volume$166.72K
Capitalization3.68B
First Ban
Price$25.59
Change+$0.85 (+3.44%)
Volume$25.48K
Capitalization287.21M
BANF vs FNLC Comparison Chart in %
BANF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FNLC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BANF vs. FNLC commentary
Nov 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BANF is a Hold and FNLC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BANF: $110.43 vs. FNLC: $25.59)
Brand notoriety: BANF and FNLC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BANF: 137% vs. FNLC: 120%
Market capitalization -- BANF: $3.68B vs. FNLC: $287.21M
BANF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.68B. FNLC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $287.21M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $173.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BANF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFNLC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BANF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FNLC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNLC is a better buy in the long-term than BANF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BANF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNLC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BANF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FNLC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNLC is a better buy in the short-term than BANF.

Price Growth

BANF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.63% price change this week, while FNLC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

BANF is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.23% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BANF($3.68B) has a higher market cap than FNLC($287M). BANF has higher P/E ratio than FNLC: BANF (15.69) vs FNLC (9.11). FNLC YTD gains are higher at: -0.984 vs. BANF (-4.647). BANF has more cash in the bank: 260M vs. FNLC (27.4M). BANF has less debt than FNLC: BANF (92M) vs FNLC (196M). BANF has higher revenues than FNLC: BANF (661M) vs FNLC (86.8M).
BANFFNLCBANF / FNLC
Capitalization3.68B287M1,283%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.647-0.984472%
P/E Ratio15.699.11172%
Revenue661M86.8M762%
Total Cash260M27.4M949%
Total Debt92M196M47%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BANF vs FNLC: Fundamental Ratings
BANF
FNLC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
733
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2846
SMR RATING
1..100
1645
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7656
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7075
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNLC's Valuation (20) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BANF (74). This means that FNLC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BANF’s over the last 12 months.

BANF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNLC (46). This means that BANF’s stock grew similarly to FNLC’s over the last 12 months.

BANF's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNLC (45). This means that BANF’s stock grew similarly to FNLC’s over the last 12 months.

FNLC's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BANF (76). This means that FNLC’s stock grew similarly to BANF’s over the last 12 months.

BANF's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNLC (75). This means that BANF’s stock grew similarly to FNLC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BANFFNLC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BANF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FNLC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLXSX16.910.45
+2.73%
Fidelity Flex Small Cap Index
TRIPX27.370.49
+1.82%
Nuveen International Eq Idx Premier
HAONX16.030.24
+1.52%
Harbor International Core Investor
WCMVX19.510.20
+1.04%
WCM Focused International Equity Ins
GQEIX21.590.15
+0.70%
GQG Partners US Select Quality Eq Instl

BANF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BANF has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BANF jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BANF
1D Price
Change %
BANF100%
+3.69%
UBSI - BANF
89%
Closely correlated
+4.11%
IBOC - BANF
89%
Closely correlated
+2.88%
UCB - BANF
88%
Closely correlated
+2.62%
IBCP - BANF
86%
Closely correlated
+2.78%
THFF - BANF
86%
Closely correlated
+3.52%
More