BANF
Price
$123.08
Change
+$2.37 (+1.96%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.9B
41 days until earnings call
MCBS
Price
$27.89
Change
+$0.58 (+2.12%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
629.13M
42 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BANF vs MCBS

Header iconBANF vs MCBS Comparison
Open Charts BANF vs MCBSBanner chart's image
BancFirst
Price$123.08
Change+$2.37 (+1.96%)
Volume$1.09K
Capitalization2.9B
MetroCity Bankshares
Price$27.89
Change+$0.58 (+2.12%)
Volume$200
Capitalization629.13M
BANF vs MCBS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BANF vs. MCBS commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BANF is a StrongBuy and MCBS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BANF: $120.59 vs. MCBS: $27.31)
Brand notoriety: BANF and MCBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BANF: 72% vs. MCBS: 84%
Market capitalization -- BANF: $2.9B vs. MCBS: $629.13M
BANF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.9B. MCBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $629.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BANF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMCBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BANF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MCBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BANF is a better buy in the long-term than MCBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BANF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BANF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MCBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BANF and MCBS are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BANF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.78% price change this week, while MCBS (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

BANF is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

MCBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.41% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BANF($2.9B) has a higher market cap than MCBS($629M). BANF has higher P/E ratio than MCBS: BANF (13.56) vs MCBS (11.86). BANF YTD gains are higher at: 3.344 vs. MCBS (-13.184). MCBS has more cash in the bank: 251M vs. BANF (225M). BANF has less debt than MCBS: BANF (86.1M) vs MCBS (334M). BANF has higher revenues than MCBS: BANF (610M) vs MCBS (118M).
BANFMCBSBANF / MCBS
Capitalization2.9B629M461%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.344-13.184-25%
P/E Ratio13.5611.86114%
Revenue610M118M517%
Total Cash225M251M90%
Total Debt86.1M334M26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BANF vs MCBS: Fundamental Ratings
BANF
MCBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7368
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1727
SMR RATING
1..100
912
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4760
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1868
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCBS's Valuation (87) in the null industry is in the same range as BANF (96) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to BANF’s over the last 12 months.

BANF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (27) in the null industry. This means that BANF’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

BANF's SMR Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (12) in the null industry. This means that BANF’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

BANF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (60) in the null industry. This means that BANF’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

BANF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCBS (68) in the null industry. This means that BANF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BANFMCBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PPUMX12.81N/A
N/A
Principal LargeCap Growth I R3
SRUIX13.81N/A
N/A
Meeder Spectrum Institutional
FRBRX123.82N/A
N/A
Franklin Biotechnology Discovery R6
LOFLX13.74N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value F3
VLMIX35.04-0.09
-0.26%
Value Line Mid Cap Focused Institutional

BANF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BANF has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BANF jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BANF
1D Price
Change %
BANF100%
-1.06%
FFBC - BANF
89%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
IBOC - BANF
89%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
UBSI - BANF
87%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
FFIN - BANF
87%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
BHLB - BANF
87%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
More

MCBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCBS has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCBS jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCBS
1D Price
Change %
MCBS100%
-0.22%
TRMK - MCBS
87%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
CTBI - MCBS
87%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
BANF - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
-1.06%
IBOC - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
UBSI - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
More