BANF
Price
$107.78
Change
+$0.13 (+0.12%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.6B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UBSI
Price
$35.59
Change
+$0.23 (+0.65%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
5B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BANF vs UBSI

Header iconBANF vs UBSI Comparison
Open Charts BANF vs UBSIBanner chart's image
BancFirst
Price$107.78
Change+$0.13 (+0.12%)
Volume$2.17K
Capitalization3.6B
United Bankshares
Price$35.59
Change+$0.23 (+0.65%)
Volume$571.8K
Capitalization5B
BANF vs UBSI Comparison Chart in %
BANF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UBSI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BANF vs. UBSI commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BANF is a Hold and UBSI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BANF: $107.94 vs. UBSI: $35.60)
Brand notoriety: BANF and UBSI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BANF: 89% vs. UBSI: 78%
Market capitalization -- BANF: $3.6B vs. UBSI: $5B
BANF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.6B. UBSI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BANF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUBSI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BANF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UBSI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UBSI is a better buy in the long-term than BANF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BANF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBSI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BANF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UBSI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BANF is a better buy in the short-term than UBSI.

Price Growth

BANF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.84% price change this week, while UBSI (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

BANF is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2026.

UBSI is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.93% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBSI($5B) has a higher market cap than BANF($3.6B). BANF has higher P/E ratio than UBSI: BANF (15.33) vs UBSI (11.67). UBSI YTD gains are higher at: -2.215 vs. BANF (-6.797). UBSI has more cash in the bank: 327M vs. BANF (260M). BANF has less debt than UBSI: BANF (92M) vs UBSI (648M). UBSI has higher revenues than BANF: UBSI (1.12B) vs BANF (661M).
BANFUBSIBANF / UBSI
Capitalization3.6B5B72%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.797-2.215307%
P/E Ratio15.3311.67131%
Revenue661M1.12B59%
Total Cash260M327M80%
Total Debt92M648M14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BANF vs UBSI: Fundamental Ratings
BANF
UBSI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
54
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3045
SMR RATING
1..100
1612
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7659
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7075
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UBSI's Valuation (36) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BANF (75). This means that UBSI’s stock grew somewhat faster than BANF’s over the last 12 months.

BANF's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UBSI (45). This means that BANF’s stock grew similarly to UBSI’s over the last 12 months.

UBSI's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BANF (16). This means that UBSI’s stock grew similarly to BANF’s over the last 12 months.

UBSI's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BANF (76). This means that UBSI’s stock grew similarly to BANF’s over the last 12 months.

BANF's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UBSI (75). This means that BANF’s stock grew similarly to UBSI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BANFUBSI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BANF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UBSI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSLEX72.220.12
+0.17%
American Funds SMALLCAP World R4
KMVAX36.05N/A
N/A
Kirr Marbach Partners Value
HCPCX50.69N/A
N/A
Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS IC
GEIZX18.73N/A
N/A
GuideStone Funds Growth Equity Index Inv
GTDYX39.97-0.01
-0.03%
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China Y

BANF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BANF has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BANF jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BANF
1D Price
Change %
BANF100%
+0.27%
UBSI - BANF
89%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
IBOC - BANF
89%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
UCB - BANF
88%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
IBCP - BANF
86%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
THFF - BANF
86%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
More