BANFP
Price
$26.05
Change
-$0.45 (-1.70%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
CASH
Price
$74.01
Change
-$0.88 (-1.18%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.69B
21 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BANFP vs CASH

Header iconBANFP vs CASH Comparison
Open Charts BANFP vs CASHBanner chart's image
BancFirst
Price$26.05
Change-$0.45 (-1.70%)
Volume$545
CapitalizationN/A
Pathward Financial
Price$74.01
Change-$0.88 (-1.18%)
Volume$212.93K
Capitalization1.69B
BANFP vs CASH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BANFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CASH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BANFP vs. CASH commentary
Oct 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BANFP is a Buy and CASH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 01, 2025
Stock price -- (BANFP: $26.50 vs. CASH: $74.01)
Brand notoriety: BANFP and CASH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BANFP: 64% vs. CASH: 117%
Market capitalization -- BANFP: $0 vs. CASH: $1.69B
BANFP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. CASH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $164.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BANFP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCASH’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BANFP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CASH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CASH is a better buy in the long-term than BANFP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BANFP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CASH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BANFP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CASH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BANFP is a better buy in the short-term than CASH.

Price Growth

BANFP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.09% price change this week, while CASH (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

CASH is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BANFP YTD gains are higher at: 7.294 vs. CASH (0.787).
BANFPCASHBANFP / CASH
CapitalizationN/A1.69B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.2940.787927%
P/E RatioN/A10.66-
RevenueN/A592M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A33.4M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BANFP vs CASH: Fundamental Ratings
BANFP
CASH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
162
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10027
SMR RATING
1..100
10016
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5460
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10033
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BANFP's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CASH (67) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BANFP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CASH’s over the last 12 months.

CASH's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BANFP (100) in the null industry. This means that CASH’s stock grew significantly faster than BANFP’s over the last 12 months.

CASH's SMR Rating (16) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BANFP (100) in the null industry. This means that CASH’s stock grew significantly faster than BANFP’s over the last 12 months.

BANFP's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as CASH (60) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BANFP’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

CASH's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BANFP (100) in the null industry. This means that CASH’s stock grew significantly faster than BANFP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BANFPCASH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BANFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CASH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
METCB16.810.69
+4.28%
Ramaco Resources
APPF282.584.05
+1.45%
AppFolio
LWAY27.030.09
+0.33%
Lifeway Foods
HBANM23.520.05
+0.21%
Huntington Bancshares
RGS28.52-0.11
-0.38%
Regis Corp

BANFP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BANFP and FITBI have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BANFP and FITBI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BANFP
1D Price
Change %
BANFP100%
+0.38%
FITBI - BANFP
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
BAFN - BANFP
29%
Poorly correlated
+16.52%
UVSP - BANFP
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
CASH - BANFP
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
CWBC - BANFP
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
More