BANFP
Price
$26.05
Change
-$0.45 (-1.70%)
Updated
Sep 30, 03:14 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
UVSP
Price
$29.99
Change
-$0.17 (-0.56%)
Updated
Sep 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
882.3M
22 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BANFP vs UVSP

Header iconBANFP vs UVSP Comparison
Open Charts BANFP vs UVSPBanner chart's image
BancFirst
Price$26.05
Change-$0.45 (-1.70%)
Volume$138
CapitalizationN/A
Univest Financial
Price$29.99
Change-$0.17 (-0.56%)
Volume$1.11K
Capitalization882.3M
BANFP vs UVSP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BANFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UVSP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BANFP vs. UVSP commentary
Oct 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BANFP is a Buy and UVSP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 01, 2025
Stock price -- (BANFP: $26.50 vs. UVSP: $30.16)
Brand notoriety: BANFP and UVSP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BANFP: 64% vs. UVSP: 77%
Market capitalization -- BANFP: $0 vs. UVSP: $882.3M
BANFP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. UVSP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $882.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BANFP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUVSP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BANFP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UVSP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UVSP is a better buy in the long-term than BANFP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BANFP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UVSP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BANFP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UVSP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BANFP is a better buy in the short-term than UVSP.

Price Growth

BANFP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.09% price change this week, while UVSP (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

UVSP is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BANFP YTD gains are higher at: 7.294 vs. UVSP (4.465).
BANFPUVSPBANFP / UVSP
CapitalizationN/A882M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.2944.465163%
P/E RatioN/A11.05-
RevenueN/A310M-
Total CashN/A76.6M-
Total DebtN/A380M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BANFP vs UVSP: Fundamental Ratings
BANFP
UVSP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
154
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10035
SMR RATING
1..100
10028
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5458
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10051
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BANFP's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as UVSP (32) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BANFP’s stock grew similarly to UVSP’s over the last 12 months.

UVSP's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BANFP (100) in the null industry. This means that UVSP’s stock grew somewhat faster than BANFP’s over the last 12 months.

UVSP's SMR Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BANFP (100) in the null industry. This means that UVSP’s stock grew significantly faster than BANFP’s over the last 12 months.

BANFP's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as UVSP (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BANFP’s stock grew similarly to UVSP’s over the last 12 months.

UVSP's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BANFP (100) in the null industry. This means that UVSP’s stock grew somewhat faster than BANFP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BANFPUVSP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BANFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UVSP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAFOX9.33N/A
N/A
BlackRock Large Cap Focus Growth Instl
IASCX12.67N/A
N/A
Voya Small Company Port A
DEMRX29.55N/A
N/A
Macquarie Emerging Markets R
WENRX67.42N/A
N/A
Allspring Mid Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
WAUSX14.74N/A
N/A
Wasatch US Select Investor

BANFP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BANFP and FITBI have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BANFP and FITBI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BANFP
1D Price
Change %
BANFP100%
+0.38%
FITBI - BANFP
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
BAFN - BANFP
29%
Poorly correlated
+16.52%
UVSP - BANFP
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
CASH - BANFP
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
CWBC - BANFP
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
More