BAOB
Price
$4.45
Change
+$0.07 (+1.60%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
40.9M
GPFOF
Price
$2.54
Change
-$0.03 (-1.17%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
15.91B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAOB vs GPFOF

Header iconBAOB vs GPFOF Comparison
Open Charts BAOB vs GPFOFBanner chart's image
Baraboo Bancorporation, Inc. (THE)
Price$4.45
Change+$0.07 (+1.60%)
Volume$100
Capitalization40.9M
Grupo Financiero Inbursa, S.A. de C.V
Price$2.54
Change-$0.03 (-1.17%)
Volume$5.3K
Capitalization15.91B
BAOB vs GPFOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BAOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAOB vs. GPFOF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAOB is a Buy and GPFOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BAOB: $4.45 vs. GPFOF: $2.54)
Brand notoriety: BAOB and GPFOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAOB: 4% vs. GPFOF: 250%
Market capitalization -- BAOB: $40.9M vs. GPFOF: $15.91B
BAOB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $40.9M. GPFOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $15.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAOB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGPFOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BAOB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GPFOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAOB is a better buy in the long-term than GPFOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAOB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GPFOF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAOB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GPFOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAOB is a better buy in the short-term than GPFOF.

Price Growth

BAOB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.49% price change this week, while GPFOF (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPFOF($15.9B) has a higher market cap than BAOB($40.9M). BAOB has higher P/E ratio than GPFOF: BAOB (8.40) vs GPFOF (7.54). BAOB YTD gains are higher at: 32.848 vs. GPFOF (8.085). BAOB has less debt than GPFOF: BAOB (8.1M) vs GPFOF (51.5B). GPFOF has higher revenues than BAOB: GPFOF (85.7B) vs BAOB (18.2M).
BAOBGPFOFBAOB / GPFOF
Capitalization40.9M15.9B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD32.8488.085406%
P/E Ratio8.407.54111%
Revenue18.2M85.7B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt8.1M51.5B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAOB vs GPFOF: Fundamental Ratings
BAOB
GPFOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2789
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3934
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4656
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAOB's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as GPFOF (43). This means that BAOB’s stock grew similarly to GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as BAOB (39). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew similarly to BAOB’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BAOB (100). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew similarly to BAOB’s over the last 12 months.

BAOB's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as GPFOF (56). This means that BAOB’s stock grew similarly to GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

BAOB's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GPFOF (100). This means that BAOB’s stock grew similarly to GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAOBGPFOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NRRWF0.03N/A
N/A
Nuran Wireless Inc
NSFMF11.50N/A
N/A
NISSHIN SEIFUN GROUP INC
TDCSF9.00N/A
N/A
Tdc Software Engineering Inc.
JMHLY59.18-0.50
-0.84%
Jardine Matheson Holdings Ltd.
WBQNL3.26-0.03
-0.91%
Woodbridge Liquidation Trust

BAOB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BAOB and GPFOF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BAOB and GPFOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAOB
1D Price
Change %
BAOB100%
+1.60%
GPFOF - BAOB
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
TCBS - BAOB
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
KLIB - BAOB
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCAL - BAOB
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
BEOB - BAOB
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
More

GPFOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPFOF has been loosely correlated with BNCZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPFOF jumps, then BNCZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPFOF
1D Price
Change %
GPFOF100%
-1.35%
BNCZF - GPFOF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CSHX - GPFOF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ALBKY - GPFOF
37%
Loosely correlated
+4.46%
SLRK - GPFOF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
OSBK - GPFOF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
More